05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Exploring Linkages between <strong>Citizenship</strong>, Livelihood Security 361<br />

the question of how women’s personal control over resources will help<br />

in altering patriarchal relations and impact on gender asymmetry—the<br />

preference <strong>for</strong> male children, violence against women, as well as ensuring<br />

equal opportunities <strong>for</strong> girls in choosing their future—has not<br />

been articulated clearly and remains unclear to programme managers<br />

(IDS 2004).<br />

It is clearly evident that the project, while addressing the economic<br />

needs of women, has not focused on aspects of women’s subordination<br />

and the structural causes of inequality that deny women their rights and<br />

prevent them from gaining a voice. The CIGs are yet to reach a stage where<br />

they can demand and question their social and political contexts, and get<br />

into a bargaining position and engage strategically with the state. This<br />

in turn would help achieve the objective of sustained and empowered<br />

livelihoods.<br />

It is also evident that the need <strong>for</strong> using the gender lens at all stages of<br />

planning, implementation and evaluation has not become an institutional<br />

habit, nor is it an assimilated perspective in DPIP. No ef<strong>for</strong>t seems to have<br />

been made within DPIP to understand the gender-differentiated nature<br />

of the experience of poverty and the constraints women face in struggling<br />

out of poverty. The experience suggests that issues of gender and poverty<br />

cannot be reduced to quotas <strong>for</strong> women, as in the Integrated Rural <strong>Development</strong><br />

Programme (IRDP), or women’s specific target groups as in the<br />

<strong>Development</strong> of Women and Children in Rural Areas (DWCRA). Such<br />

interventions may merely serve to institutionalise the marginal position<br />

given to women in official development (Rajagopal 2004).<br />

In contrast, in a recent intervention on poverty alleviation around<br />

natural resource management, the ef<strong>for</strong>t has been to promote women’s<br />

collectives <strong>for</strong> integrated development involving issues of livelihood,<br />

environment and the use of local resources. Central to the process is motivating<br />

women to take on leadership roles and empowering them instead<br />

of creating a dependency on institutions. Convincing men regarding<br />

women’s role in decision-making is an ongoing activity. In one district<br />

(which is common to DPIP) where the project is being implemented,<br />

regular trainings and meetings have been organised by the partner NGO,<br />

where women have discussed issues related to their participation in village<br />

<strong>for</strong>ums, their role in village development, understanding of rights and<br />

duties, health issues, right to food, right to work, and issues related to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!