05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Recasting</strong> <strong>Citizenship</strong> <strong>for</strong> Women’s Livelihood and <strong>Development</strong> 5<br />

development practitioners, ‘livelihood’ is a straight<strong>for</strong>ward term, as<br />

defined in dictionaries: the means of living and sustenance. For people’s<br />

movements, such as the Chipko struggle that aimed to protect the hill<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests of Uttarakhand, the ‘means of living’ encompassed the sustainability<br />

of the resource base. In the 1970s, the Chipko leader Chandi Prasad<br />

Bhatt repeatedly said: ‘Saving the trees is only the first step, saving ourselves<br />

is the goal’ (Krishna 1996b). Such perceptions from ‘below’, which were<br />

rooted in the everyday reality of poor people’s lives, influenced the way<br />

in which people were thinking and writing about development and contributed<br />

to the emergence of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach or<br />

framework in the 1990s. Compared to earlier approaches to ‘poverty alleviation’<br />

<strong>for</strong> meeting basic needs and <strong>for</strong> income-generation in specific<br />

sectors, the new emphasis on livelihoods covered a much wider cluster of<br />

factors. Chambers (1995) defined livelihood as the ‘means of gaining a<br />

living, including tangible assets (resources and stores), intangible assets<br />

(claims and access), and livelihood capabilities’ including coping abilities,<br />

opportunities and sundry freedoms.<br />

The broader focus on livelihood rather than on incomes was also<br />

projected in the document called Agenda 21 (United Nations 1992), the<br />

non-binding ‘Plan of Action’ adopted at the 1992 UN Conference on<br />

Environment and <strong>Development</strong> at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ‘Enabling the<br />

poor to achieve sustainable livelihoods’ is up-front in the chapter ‘Combating<br />

Poverty’. It states:<br />

While managing resources sustainably, an environmental policy that focuses<br />

mainly on the conservation and protection of resources must take due<br />

account of those who depend on the resources <strong>for</strong> their livelihoods. Otherwise<br />

it could have an adverse impact both on poverty and on chances <strong>for</strong><br />

long-term success in resource and environmental conservation’. (3.2: 15)<br />

Further, ‘The long-term objective of enabling all people to achieve<br />

sustainable livelihoods should provide an integrating factor that allows<br />

policies to address issues of development, sustainable resource management<br />

and poverty eradication simultaneously’. The first programme<br />

objective is to ‘provide all persons urgently with the opportunity to earn<br />

a sustainable livelihood’.<br />

Also in relation to poverty, the 1995 Fourth World Conference on<br />

Women at Beijing, China, in its Plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> Action (United Nations 1996)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!