05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

300 VINALINI MATHRANI AND VANI PERIODI<br />

proceeded to break the tank. At this juncture, an SC schoolteacher filed a<br />

police complaint alleging that the women were destroying a public facility.<br />

In reality, he wanted to acquire the land <strong>for</strong> himself. A police constable<br />

and some other officials arrived at the site, and requested the women to<br />

stop breaking the tank till they verified the claims. They contacted the<br />

panchayat members who clarified that the women’s claims were valid.<br />

Kurukunda, Raichur District: The women contacted the sahyogini,<br />

who advised them to go to the GP. In September 2000, the women put in<br />

an application. At the same time, the MLA visited the village to canvass<br />

votes <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>thcoming election. All 30 sangha women agreed to vote<br />

<strong>for</strong> him on the condition that he help them construct their sangha mané.<br />

He agreed, provided they identified and acquired the land themselves. The<br />

women identified a plot on the grazing land of the village. They asked<br />

the MLA and the Gowda to assist them in getting it sanctioned. Two women<br />

from the Panchayati Raj Committee took the responsibility <strong>for</strong> getting<br />

the title deeds. In December 2000, two sangha women went to the<br />

panchayat meeting. A sangha woman was the panchayat adhayksh (head).<br />

She ensured that the plot was sanctioned. In February 2001, the GP secretary<br />

came to the village and marked out the sanctioned site.<br />

Dotihalla, Koppal District: The process of land acquisition began in<br />

June 1995. A sangha woman was a member of the Panchayati Raj Committee<br />

in the mahila sangha. She contested <strong>for</strong> the gram panchayat elections<br />

and won, because she had the required experience and the support of the<br />

sangha women. The elections took place while the land acquisition process<br />

was underway. Hence, the two processes fed into each other. The women<br />

approached the GP <strong>for</strong> this purpose on numerous occasions. Their requests<br />

were rejected on the grounds that there was no land available. The<br />

women identified a plot in the SC colony, but the GP refused to consider<br />

this application as it was a part of the gaothan land. The women asked<br />

the GP secretary to issue a letter stating this. He refused. In the meantime, the<br />

sangha woman who had been elected to the panchayat went to Bangalore<br />

to attend a training programme. With the help of the Mahila Samakhya<br />

state office team, she got in touch with the chief secretary on this matter.<br />

He agreed to look into the case. Finally the GP issued the title deeds to<br />

the same plot in June 1996.<br />

Banikuppe, Mysore District: The sangha women contacted the village<br />

Gowda in 1993. He in turn approached the men’s sangha (Adi Jambava

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!