05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Restructuring the Employment Guarantee Scheme 149<br />

70 women had some land, which does not give us landholding size. The<br />

majority were landless. Only 39 women claimed to have farming as a<br />

basic category <strong>for</strong> income, while 110 earned their income from wages.<br />

Nine earned their main income from salaries, having salaried persons in<br />

their families. In 142 families, there was only one woman as a working<br />

member, whereas in 122 families there was only one working man.<br />

In 23 families, more than one woman was earning money, compared to<br />

35 families with more than one earning man. Women had a strong presence<br />

as workers and earning members in the family.<br />

In all, 61 women came from families earning less than Rs 2,000 a month,<br />

while 92 earned less than Rs 1,000; 32 of the women did not report on this.<br />

Of the 185 women, 106 had BPL cards and 75 did not; 27 women said<br />

that their families have taken bank loans: seven had repaid the loan,<br />

16 were either in the process of doing so, or may have been defaulters. Of<br />

the 103 women who had taken the saving group loan, 70 had borrowed<br />

more than Rs 1,000 and the rest below Rs 1,000, and of these, 26 women<br />

had returned the loan and 67 were in the process of returning it. The<br />

loans were mainly <strong>for</strong> illness, house repairs and, in a few cases, <strong>for</strong> family<br />

farming. SHG activity was apparently not very strong, in terms of the<br />

availability of loan funds. Among all these 185 women, there was no major<br />

income-generating activity.<br />

We could not get much background in<strong>for</strong>mation on the villages as it<br />

was very difficult to meet the gram sevaks or talathi in the village. We<br />

tried to meet them at the taluka offices during their monthly meetings. But<br />

even with an appointment, on the particular day they would not be there<br />

to share the in<strong>for</strong>mation. So our village pro<strong>for</strong>mas could not be filled.<br />

WOMEN’S VOICES<br />

Our interaction with the women on the matter of accessing land <strong>for</strong> orchard<br />

cultivation is presented below in their own voices.<br />

On the Availability of Land<br />

The majority of the women did not have land of their own and were<br />

worried that nobody would give land on lease to poor women. The gairan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!