05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Women in Pastoralist and Shifting Cultivation Communities 55<br />

The preferred strategy <strong>for</strong> controlling grazing within existing <strong>for</strong>estry<br />

policies is vividly illustrated in the revised Forest Policy <strong>for</strong> Andhra<br />

Pradesh, which was announced by the Andhra Pradesh Forest Department<br />

in April 2002 through G.O. MS 34. An entire section (3.1.2) is devoted to<br />

the issue of grazing and states:<br />

The present policy of free grazing in the <strong>for</strong>ests is detrimental to regeneration<br />

and establishment of vegetation. There is need <strong>for</strong> reasonable<br />

restrictions on grazing. Further the burden of scrub cattle on the already<br />

scarce fodder resources needs to be reduced by upgrading the cattle stock,<br />

and encouraging stall feeding … there will be coordinated ef<strong>for</strong>ts with the<br />

Animal Husbandry Department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh to<br />

improve the quality of livestock in the <strong>for</strong>est fringe areas so that the number<br />

of cattle heads will be reduced. (Emphasis added)<br />

Similarly, in the context of shifting cultivators, as we saw clearly, the<br />

attempts through, <strong>for</strong> instance, the IFAD interventions have been to<br />

introduce Green Revolution technologies—high yielding seeds, monocropping<br />

and rehabilitating podu land through plantations of cashew<br />

nut and coffee on the shifting cultivation fallows. Once again, this practice<br />

is reflected in policy, with the 2002 Forest Policy of Andhra Pradesh devoting<br />

a separate section (3.1.3) to ‘Encroachments and Podu’, wherein it<br />

is stated:<br />

[T]he traditional shifting cultivation practiced by Tribals, is trans<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

into settled agriculture. Such type of cultivation is resulting in land degradation<br />

and unsustainable agriculture leading to poverty and increasing<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> land again <strong>for</strong> further cultivation … there is urgent need to<br />

educate the tribal on sustainable farming … access to improved agriculture<br />

practices <strong>for</strong> these tribals needs to be made available. (Emphasis added)<br />

Replacing seeds and breeds, and <strong>for</strong>cing people to lose control over their<br />

genetic resources are perhaps the ultimate <strong>for</strong>ms/modes by which the<br />

state takes control of natural resources, thus permanently alienating communities<br />

from their means of production.<br />

Ironically, in the context of both seeds and livestock breeds, it must be<br />

noted that women play a crucial role in saving the primary germplasm<br />

essential <strong>for</strong> subsequent production—seeds <strong>for</strong> sowing in the case of<br />

shifting cultivators, and young stock of sheep and goat breeds in the case

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!