05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Recasting</strong> <strong>Citizenship</strong> <strong>for</strong> Women’s Livelihood and <strong>Development</strong> 21<br />

largely due to government expenditure on relief works and the creation<br />

of jobs (see Sen 1996). In the 1990s, with the advent of new economic<br />

policies and the reduction of government expenditures, poverty levels<br />

stagnated, with the exception of parts of western and southern India,<br />

although pockets of poverty continued to persist even in these better-off<br />

regions. Poverty has been linked to increasing inequality. Sen and<br />

Himanshu (2004) point out that the ‘big picture’ is that ‘the 1990s was the<br />

first post-Independence decade when economic inequality increased<br />

sharply in all its dimensions’. (In their analysis, inequality had increased in<br />

rural areas during the post-Green Revolution period too, but there was ‘a<br />

tendency <strong>for</strong> relative food prices to fall’ and from the mid-1970s through<br />

the 1990s rural inequality decreased. With growth, this led to a fall in<br />

poverty levels during that period.) Disparities increased after the early<br />

1990s as food prices increased. Sen and Himanshu (ibid.) further say<br />

that ‘high initial poverty and population growth seem to have ensured that<br />

India’s growth revival after 1992 has largely bypassed the poor. The relatively<br />

rich did gain and some states did per<strong>for</strong>m better than the others’.<br />

They have little doubt that the number of poor increased in the most<br />

populated regions, and they see the large shift in the 1990s from food to<br />

non-food expenditure, such as on fuel, medicines and conveyance, even<br />

among the poor, as indicative of a ‘worsening nutrition situation’. This<br />

strengthens their argument against excluding numbers of the poor from<br />

food subsidies.<br />

According to the 2001 Census, in India as a whole, 52 per cent of males<br />

reported themselves as ‘workers’ compared to only 25 per cent of females.<br />

However, only 58 per cent of the male workers were engaged in agriculture<br />

and allied occupations, compared to nearly 80 per cent of the female workers.<br />

This confirms the casual observations from across the country that<br />

the burden of agriculture is shifting to women (a trend that has been termed<br />

as the ‘feminisation of agriculture’); in certain areas, such as in parts of<br />

north-eastern India, this burden is increasingly being borne almost entirely<br />

by older women (Krishna 1998a, 1998b, 2005). The National Sample<br />

Surveys (NSSs) provide a more comprehensive coverage of work, but<br />

neither the NSS nor the census accurately reflects the extent of women’s<br />

work (see Krishna 2001; Raju 1993; Jhabvala et al. 2003, Krishna 2004a):<br />

household chores, home-based work and in<strong>for</strong>mal labour in subsistence<br />

dairying, livestock rearing, fishing, hunting, cultivating fruit and vegetable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!