05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 SUMI KRISHNA<br />

Following sustained campaigns by the women’s movement, the law on<br />

the inheritance of property has now been re<strong>for</strong>med. The Hindu Succession<br />

(Amendment) Act, 2005, removes gender inequalities in the inheritance<br />

of agricultural land (see Box 12.1).<br />

A few of the more progressive states had introduced legal and administrative<br />

measures by the 1980s to give women a share in property (such<br />

as ‘joint pattas’, title deeds in the names of both the husband and the<br />

wife). The central budget <strong>for</strong> 2005–6 gave women concessions with regard<br />

to property registration. Extrapolating data from a larger study on watershed<br />

development in Karnataka, M. Indira (Chapter 12, this volume)<br />

found that women’s title to land had not as yet given them a greater say<br />

in decision-making relating to production, marketing, purchase and<br />

sale of assets, or control over money. Indeed, earning an income seems<br />

to have been more significant <strong>for</strong> women than owning land. Similarly,<br />

Geethakutty’s (2006) survey of a randomly selected group of farming<br />

women in Thrissur district in Kerala found a relatively high proportion<br />

of women who owned land in their own names or held it jointly with<br />

their husbands. Yet land ownership, whether by inheritance or purchase,<br />

did not seem to have much impact on women’s ability to access farmersupport<br />

services. The farming women perceived the potential <strong>for</strong> activities<br />

only in those spaces that were intended <strong>for</strong> women alone, notably the<br />

Self Help Groups (SHGs). ‘General institutions’ like cooperative societies<br />

were not viewed as women’s spaces. Moreover, both land-owning and<br />

landless women did not perceive landownership as important either <strong>for</strong><br />

livelihood or their own status. This has resonances with the attitude of the<br />

poor women of Osmanabad, despite the geographical and socio-economic<br />

distance that separates the drought-prone, backward hinterland of<br />

Maharashtra from the green fields and waterways of Thrissur. These micro<br />

studies should not be read as indicating that land ownership is not important,<br />

but they do show that having title deeds to land in their names<br />

may not always be sufficient to enhance women’s livelihoods and position.<br />

Gender-just laws do facilitate change, but the trans<strong>for</strong>mation of social<br />

practice is a much more difficult process. Consider the case of Goa (a<br />

Portuguese colony till its liberation and union with India in 1961). Civil<br />

law in Goa follows the Portuguese Civil Code, established over a century<br />

ago in 1867, which makes the registration of marriages compulsory <strong>for</strong><br />

all communities and assures married women a share in their husband’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!