05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 NEERA M. SINGH<br />

These early networking examples provided directions and lessons<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation of the Parishad. For almost a year, during 1996–97,<br />

Vasundhara staff facilitated meetings at the village and cluster levels, where<br />

community members expressed the need <strong>for</strong> networking and <strong>for</strong> a collective<br />

<strong>for</strong>um. According to community leaders, they felt that such a <strong>for</strong>um<br />

would help in resolving inter- and intra-village conflicts, and in increasing<br />

their collective strength to deal with external threats. Following this, in<br />

1997, around 85 villages came together to <strong>for</strong>m a loose network, which<br />

was named the Maa Maninag Jungle Surakhya Parishad, in honour of<br />

the local deity, Maa Maninag, and the Maninag hill and <strong>for</strong>est.<br />

In the initial phase, the Parishad was dominated by men and there<br />

were hardly any women present at the meetings, as has been the usual case<br />

with other CFM groups and federations. The discussion on women’s<br />

involvement at one of the Parishad’s initial meetings is illustrative. At a<br />

meeting in 1997, when Parishad members were discussing the structure<br />

and tentative byelaws, they were not very <strong>for</strong>thcoming with any special<br />

provisions <strong>for</strong> the representation of women and other marginalised<br />

sections such as Dalits and tribals. Staff from the facilitating organisation,<br />

Vasundhara, gently nudged, ‘What about women, do you want to keep<br />

any special stipulations on women’s representation? What about Dalits<br />

and tribals?’ The response from the federation leaders was: ‘But these are<br />

people who destroy <strong>for</strong>ests! If we allow them in, or give special consideration<br />

to their interests and needs, the <strong>for</strong>est will be gone in no time.’ A<br />

very heated discussion ensued. ‘Is this really the case, and can <strong>for</strong>ests be<br />

protected by ignoring the needs and interests of these <strong>for</strong>est dependent<br />

sections?’ The federation leaders discussed this till late in the night. The<br />

next morning, the secretary of the Parishad shared their decision, ‘We<br />

discussed this issue at length. We will include women (that is, make special<br />

provisions <strong>for</strong> their representation). Otherwise, it will not look nice.<br />

Nowadays, most agencies/organisations insist on women’s involvement.<br />

There are also reservations <strong>for</strong> women at different places, including the<br />

panchayats. Against this backdrop, it will not look nice if we do not include<br />

women. So, we have decided that we will keep women (make provisions<br />

<strong>for</strong> their involvement)’.<br />

The Parishad has come a long way from the time they included women<br />

as part of a cosmetic ‘look good’ strategy. Here, I discuss this process of<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>mation. This section is based on an analysis of the records of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!