Bibliography 117. Buckingham-Meyer, K., Goeres, D., and Hamilton, M., Comparative evaluation <strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>ilm disinfectant efficacy tests. 2007. Journal <strong>of</strong> Microbiological Methods. 70(2): 236-244. 118. Bagge, D., Hjelm, M., Johansen, C., Huber, I., Gram, L., Shewanella putrefaciens Adhesion and Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm Formation on Food Processing Surfaces. 2001. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67(5): 2319-2325. 119. Seidler, M., S. Salvenmoser, and F.-M.C. Müller, Liposomal amphotericin B eradicates Candida albicans bi<strong>of</strong>ilm in a continuous catheter flow model. 2010. FEMS Yeast Research. 10(4): 492-495. 120. Nailis, H., Vandenbroucke, R, Tilleman, K., Deforce, D., Nelis, H., Coenye, T., Monitoring ALS1 and ALS3 Gene Expression During In Vitro Candida albicans Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm Formationn Under Continuous Flow Conditions. 2009. Mycopathologia. 167(1): 9-17. 121. Nailis, H., Kucharikova, S., Ricicova, M., Van Dijck, P., Deforce, D., Nelis, H., Coenye, T., Real-time PCR expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> genes encoding potential virulence factors in Candida albicans bi<strong>of</strong>ilms: identification <strong>of</strong> model-dependent and -independent gene expression. 2010. BMC Microbiology. 10(1): 114. 122. Gilmore, B., Hamill, T., Jones, D. Gorman, S., Validation <strong>of</strong> the CDC bi<strong>of</strong>ilm reactor as a dynamic model for assessment <strong>of</strong> encrustation formation on urological device materials. 2010. Journal <strong>of</strong> Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials. 93(1): 128-140. 123. Hadi, R., Vickery, K., Deva, A.and Charlton, T., Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm removal by medical device cleaners: comparison <strong>of</strong> two bioreactor detection assays. 2010. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hospital Infection. 74(2): 160-167. 124. Donlan, R., Piede, J., Heyes, C., Sanii, L., Murga, R., Edmonds, P., El-Sayed, I., and El-Sayed, M., Model System for Growing and Quantifying Streptococcus pneumoniae Bi<strong>of</strong>ilms In Situ and in Real Time. 2004. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70(8): 4980-4988. 125. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E2871-12 Standard Test Method for Evaluating Disinfectant Efficacy against Page 235
Bibliography Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm Grown in CDC Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm Reactor using Single Tube Method. 2012: West Conshohocken, PA,. 126. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E2799-12 Standard Test Method for Testing Disinfectant Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bi<strong>of</strong>ilm using the MBEC Assay. 2012: West Conshohocken, PA. 127. Drago, L., Gismondo, M., Lombardi, A., de Haën, C. and Gozzini, L., Inhibition <strong>of</strong> in vitro growth <strong>of</strong> enteropathogens by new Lactobacillus isolates <strong>of</strong> human intestinal origin. 1997. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 153(2): 455-463. 128. Karatzas, K., Randall, L., Webber, M., Piddock, L., Humphrey, T., Woodward, M., Coldham, N., Phenotypic and proteomic characterization <strong>of</strong> multiply antibiotic-resistant variants <strong>of</strong> Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium selected following exposure to disinfectants. 2008. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 74: 1508 - 1516. 129. McDonnell, et al., Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. 1999. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 12(1): 147-179. 130. Møretrø, T., Heir, E., Nesse, L. L., Vestby, L. K. Langsrud, S., Control <strong>of</strong> Salmonella in food related environments by chemical disinfection. 2012. Food Research International. 45(2): 532-544. 131. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), DIN EN 1040 (2006-03) Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics - Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> basic bactericidal activity <strong>of</strong> chemical disinfectants and antiseptics - Test method and requirements, in (phase 1). 2006. 132. Randall, L.P., et al., Commonly used farm disinfectants can select for mutant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with decreased susceptibility to biocides and antibiotics without compromising virulence. 2007. Journal <strong>of</strong> Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 60(6): 1273-1280. Page 236
- Page 1:
Salmonella enterica - biofilm forma
- Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents Page Number 1.16.
- Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Page Number 4.1.2
- Page 8 and 9:
Table of Contents Page Number 6.8.4
- Page 10 and 11:
List of Abbreviations Table Page Nu
- Page 12 and 13:
List of Abbreviations List of Abbre
- Page 14 and 15:
Summary of Content Summary of Conte
- Page 16 and 17:
“To show your true ability is alw
- Page 18 and 19:
Acknowledgements ever met, Fiona th
- Page 20 and 21:
Acknowledgements This Ph.D. thesis
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 1 1.1. Salmonella Salmonell
- Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1 may impose enormous costs
- Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 cracks or penetration of
- Page 28 and 29:
Chapter 1 detected by agglutination
- Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 1 become colonized with >10
- Page 32 and 33:
Chapter 1 antigens [z27],[z45] [1].
- Page 34 and 35:
Chapter 1 S. Agona has also been im
- Page 36 and 37:
Chapter 1 isolated from undercooked
- Page 38 and 39:
Chapter 1 The S. Typhimurium strain
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapter 1 ecosystem with the use of
- Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 1 [82]. Previous research h
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 1 to genes involved in flag
- Page 46 and 47:
Chapter 1 observation has also been
- Page 48 and 49:
Chapter 1 [119] and flow cell react
- Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 1 based disinfectant) the s
- Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 1 formation of two strains
- Page 54 and 55:
Chapter 1 shield the S. Agona cells
- Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 1 Key Objectives of this st
- Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 2 2. Abstract Food-borne pa
- Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 2 indicated that there may
- Page 62 and 63:
Chapter 2 taken from industrial set
- Page 64 and 65:
Chapter 2 2.1.4. CDC Biofilm Reacto
- Page 66 and 67:
Chapter 2 can be performed without
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 2 To summarise, previous au
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 2 2.3. Methods for examinin
- Page 72 and 73:
Chapter 2 and the biofilm formed th
- Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 2 2.4. Statistical Analysis
- Page 76 and 77:
Chapter 2 Table 2.1: Strain charact
- Page 78 and 79:
Chapter 2 XII. The gas port and med
- Page 80 and 81:
Chapter 2 II. Primary fixative cons
- Page 82 and 83:
Chapter 2 IX. Once the conditions w
- Page 84 and 85:
Chapter 2 Figure 2.1: Image of CBR
- Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 2 2.6. Results 2.6.1. Asses
- Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 2 2.6.3. SEM Analysis of su
- Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 2 Figure 2.6: Complete remo
- Page 92 and 93:
Chapter 2 2.6.5. Mean log 10 densit
- Page 94 and 95:
Chapter 2 2.6.6. Mean log 10 densit
- Page 96 and 97:
Chapter 2 Table 2.5: Mean log 10 de
- Page 98 and 99:
Chapter 2 The results displayed in
- Page 100 and 101:
Chapter 2 Table 2.7: Difference bet
- Page 102 and 103:
Chapter 2 Table 2.8: The mean log 1
- Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 2 Figure 2.7: Graph of the
- Page 106 and 107:
Chapter 2 also used “high” soni
- Page 108 and 109:
Chapter 2 2.8. Summary All 13 strai
- Page 110 and 111:
Chapter 3 3. Abstract It has been e
- Page 112 and 113:
Chapter 3 classified as persistent
- Page 114 and 115:
Chapter 3 was plated onto TSA for e
- Page 116 and 117:
Chapter 3 Figure 3.1: The mean log
- Page 118 and 119:
Chapter 3 Figure 3.3: SEM image of
- Page 120 and 121:
Chapter 3 Table 3.2: Difference bet
- Page 122 and 123:
Chapter 3 3.4.3. Intra-serovar vari
- Page 124 and 125:
Chapter 3 3.4.4. Strain variation i
- Page 126 and 127:
Chapter 3 3.4.5. The density of bio
- Page 128 and 129:
Chapter 3 3.5. Discussion As illust
- Page 130 and 131:
Chapter 3 As discussed in section 3
- Page 132 and 133:
Chapter 3 increased biofilm appeare
- Page 134 and 135:
Chapter 4 Examining the efficacy of
- Page 136 and 137:
Chapter 4 through laboratory based
- Page 138 and 139:
Chapter 4 acid and quaternary ammon
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 4 the surface the temperatu
- Page 142 and 143:
Chapter 4 availability of multiple
- Page 144 and 145:
Chapter 4 peracetic acid (100, 200,
- Page 146 and 147:
Chapter 4 As discussed previously,
- Page 148 and 149:
Chapter 4 Dey/Engley (Difco) neutra
- Page 150 and 151:
Chapter 4 sterilisation was achieve
- Page 152 and 153:
Chapter 4 IX. Aliquots of 100µl of
- Page 154 and 155:
Chapter 4 XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX
- Page 156 and 157:
Chapter 4 4.3. Results 4.3.1. Suspe
- Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 4 Table 4.3: Mean log 10 de
- Page 160 and 161:
Chapter 4 Benzalkonium chloride was
- Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 4 4.4. Discussion Suspensio
- Page 164 and 165:
Chapter 4 effective at eliminating
- Page 166 and 167:
Chapter 4 Surprisingly, Nguyen et a
- Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 4 though a contact time of
- Page 170 and 171:
Chapter 4 provide a more standardis
- Page 172 and 173:
Chapter 4 hours instead of the stan
- Page 174 and 175:
Chapter 5 5. Abstract Examining bio
- Page 176 and 177:
Chapter 5 dry and rough (bdar) morp
- Page 178 and 179:
Chapter 5 absence of curli and cell
- Page 180 and 181:
Chapter 5 studies such as the micro
- Page 182 and 183:
Chapter 5 discussed in chapter 4. T
- Page 184 and 185:
Chapter 5 5.2. Methods 5.2.1. Colon
- Page 186 and 187:
Chapter 5 XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII.
- Page 188 and 189:
Chapter 5 XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. XX
- Page 190 and 191:
Chapter 5 5.3.2. Repeatability of m
- Page 192 and 193:
Chapter 5 Figure 5.2: Stained biofi
- Page 194 and 195:
Chapter 5 was formed at room temper
- Page 196 and 197:
Chapter 5 Table 5.3: The density of
- Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 5 5.3.4. The density of bio
- Page 200 and 201:
Chapter 5 Table 5.6: The difference
- Page 202 and 203:
Chapter 5 Table 5.7: The difference
- Page 204 and 205:
Chapter 5 Table 5.8: Summary of ass
- Page 206 and 207: Chapter 5 interpretation therefore
- Page 208 and 209: Chapter 5 measures of S. enterica b
- Page 210 and 211: Chapter 5 cells peaks [165, 191]. D
- Page 212 and 213: Chapter 5 5.5. Limitations of the s
- Page 214 and 215: Chapter 6 Discussion of S. enterica
- Page 216 and 217: Chapter 6 However, a number of auth
- Page 218 and 219: Chapter 6 It is of interest to exam
- Page 220 and 221: Chapter 6 were similar at 48 hours.
- Page 222 and 223: Chapter 6 attributable to a small n
- Page 224 and 225: Chapter 6 chosen as an appropriate
- Page 226 and 227: Chapter 6 undetermined. However, th
- Page 228 and 229: Chapter 6 reason for this may be du
- Page 230 and 231: Chapter 6 Moreover, based on the re
- Page 232 and 233: Chapter 6 responsible for increased
- Page 234 and 235: Chapter 6 not fully capture the ran
- Page 236 and 237: Chapter 6 However, the extent of bi
- Page 238 and 239: Chapter 6 6.10. Conclusions and rec
- Page 240 and 241: Chapter 6 studies may solve some of
- Page 242 and 243: Bibliography Bibliography Page 221
- Page 244 and 245: Bibliography 12. T. Takata, J.L., H
- Page 246 and 247: Bibliography 29. Barker, J., M. Nae
- Page 248 and 249: Bibliography 47. Threlfall, E.J., H
- Page 250 and 251: Bibliography 65. CDC. Investigation
- Page 252 and 253: Bibliography 83. Ledeboer, N., Frye
- Page 254 and 255: Bibliography 100. Chia, T., Goulter
- Page 258 and 259: Bibliography 133. European Committe
- Page 260 and 261: Bibliography Supernatant of a Hafni
- Page 262 and 263: Bibliography 165. Díez-García, M.
- Page 264 and 265: Bibliography cultivation of Staphyl
- Page 266 and 267: Bibliography Compounds. 2012. Appli
- Page 268 and 269: Bibliography 215. Buck, et al., A q
- Page 270 and 271: Bibliography Canadian Journal of Ps
- Page 272 and 273: Appendix 1 Appendix 1— List of Re
- Page 274 and 275: Appendix 1 Appendix 1 - List of Equ
- Page 276 and 277: Appendix 2 Colour index High outlie
- Page 278 and 279: Appendix 2 Colour index High outlie
- Page 280 and 281: Appendix 2 Colour index High outlie
- Page 282 and 283: Appendix 2 Colour index High outlie
- Page 284 and 285: Appendix 2 Colour index High outlie
- Page 286 and 287: Appendix 3 Appendix 3-Figure 2: PFG
- Page 288 and 289: Appendix 4 Poster Presentation Envi