- Page 1: Salmonella enterica - biofilm forma
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Page Number 2.6.5
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents 5.1.4. Assessing
- Page 9 and 10: List of Abbreviations List of Table
- Page 11 and 12: List of Figures List of Figures Fig
- Page 13 and 14: List of Abbreviations MLST NARMS N
- Page 15 and 16: Declaration Declaration This work i
- Page 17 and 18: Acknowledgements Acknowledgements F
- Page 19 and 20: Acknowledgements needed to call in
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1 An introduction to Salmon
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1 1.2. History of typhoidal
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1 1.5. Treatment of Salmone
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 1 polysaccharides) componen
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1 Multi Locus Sequence Typi
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 1 most common serovar submi
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 1 1.12.2. Previously report
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 1 cases reported in 15 stat
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1 rapidly throughout Europe
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1 and culling of seropositi
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 1 1.15.1. Structural compon
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 1 There are three categorie
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 1 1.15.3. Salmonella grown
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1 concrete) and aseptically
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 1 standardised approach to
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1 activity in contaminated
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1 of silicone disks [121].
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1 biofilm was considered ma
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 2 Assessing the density of
- Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 2 Salmonella enterica [29].
- Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 2 allowed increased removal
- Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 2 although S. Senftenberg w
- Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 2 facilitates testing of di
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 2 time) and a dried biofilm
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 2 range of 0.05-0.12 on gra
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 2 critical point drying due
- Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 2 effective method for remo
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 2 generally accepted by con
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 2 2.5. Methods 2.5.1. 48 ho
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2 XXVIII. Three sets of cou
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2 V. A vacuum was created b
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2 II. III. The sonication c
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 2 Figure 2.3: A summary of
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 2 2.6.2. Scanning Electron
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 2 Figure 2.5: Incomplete re
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 2 2.6.4. Mean log 10 densit
- Page 93 and 94:
Chapter 2 Table 2.3: Mean and stand
- Page 95 and 96:
Chapter 2 Table 2.4: Mean log 10 de
- Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 2 2.6.7. Mean log 10 densit
- Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 2 Table 2.6: Mean log 10 de
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2 2.6.9. Difference between
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2 2.6.10. Atomic Force Micr
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2 2.7. Discussion The resul
- Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 2 It is not evident from th
- Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 3 Assessing the density of
- Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 3 previously [163]. These e
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 3 formation on multiple sur
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 3 Table 3.1: The density of
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 3 Figure 3.2: SEM image dem
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 3 3.4.2. Biofilm density ov
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 3 Figure 3.4: SEM images S.
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 3 Table 3.3: Intra-serovar
- Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 3 Table 3.4: Inter-strain v
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 3 Table 3.5: The difference
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 3 authors suggested that pl
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 3 S. Enteritidis was a less
- Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 3 3.6. Summary The research
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 4 4. Abstract In the previo
- Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 4 outflow of excess disinfe
- Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 4 found in the food process
- Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 4 contact time should be us
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 4 concentrations used in in
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 4 As previously discussed B
- Page 147 and 148:
Chapter 4 sodium hypochlorite has a
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 4 4.1.8. Duration of contac
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 4 4.2. Methods 4.2.1. Broth
- Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 4 V. The coupons were relea
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 4 Table 4.2: Minimum Inhibi
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 4 coupons were incubated fo
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 4 4.3.3. Assessing the effi
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 4 Table 4.4: Mean log 10 de
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 4 minutes of contact. In ad
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 4 reported elsewhere has al
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 4 may prevent removal of th
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 4 presented in this thesis
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 4 4.5. Summary The research
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 5 Examining S. enterica bio
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 5 5.1. Introduction It was
- Page 177 and 178:
Chapter 5 5.1.2. Previous research
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 5 curli and cellulose may b
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 5 strains. However the meth
- Page 183 and 184:
Chapter 5 with a 0.05% concentratio
- Page 185 and 186:
Chapter 5 II. III. IV. A colony fro
- Page 187 and 188:
Chapter 5 V. The plates were filled
- Page 189 and 190:
Chapter 5 5.3. Results 5.3.1. The c
- Page 191 and 192:
Chapter 5 Table 5.2: The optical de
- Page 193 and 194:
Chapter 5 5.3.3. The density of bio
- Page 195 and 196:
Chapter 5 indicated through a high
- Page 197 and 198:
Chapter 5 Table 5.4: The difference
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 5 Table 5.5: The Density of
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 5 5.3.5. The difference in
- Page 203 and 204:
Chapter 5 5.3.6. Examining the effi
- Page 205 and 206:
Chapter 5 5.4. Discussion The resul
- Page 207 and 208:
Chapter 5 measurement of biofilm fo
- Page 209 and 210:
Chapter 5 indicates that the variat
- Page 211 and 212:
Chapter 5 effective in eliminating
- Page 213 and 214:
Chapter 5 5.6. Summary S. enterica
- Page 215 and 216:
Chapter 6 6. Discussion The Europea
- Page 217 and 218:
Chapter 6 model. The combination of
- Page 219 and 220:
Chapter 6 between S. Agona and S. T
- Page 221 and 222:
Chapter 6 to emphasise the importan
- Page 223 and 224:
Chapter 6 biofilm former (in compar
- Page 225 and 226:
Chapter 6 considering the same conc
- Page 227 and 228:
Chapter 6 glass, 0.18-0.94 on steel
- Page 229 and 230:
Chapter 6 multiple strains and usin
- Page 231 and 232:
Chapter 6 6.8. Limitations of the S
- Page 233 and 234:
Chapter 6 previously published mate
- Page 235 and 236:
Chapter 6 6.9. Main Findings Summar
- Page 237 and 238:
Chapter 6 and that the duration of
- Page 239 and 240:
Chapter 6 6.11. Further research Th
- Page 241 and 242:
Chapter 6 better understood. The re
- Page 243 and 244:
Bibliography 1. Grimont, P., and We
- Page 245 and 246:
Bibliography 2003--results from the
- Page 247 and 248:
Bibliography 38. NSSLRL, National S
- Page 249 and 250:
Bibliography 56. Vestby, L., Moretr
- Page 251 and 252:
Bibliography conditions. 2008. Inte
- Page 253 and 254:
Bibliography 91. Snyder, D.S., et a
- Page 255 and 256:
Bibliography Salmonella Enteritidis
- Page 257 and 258:
Bibliography Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Page 259 and 260:
Bibliography 141. Marin, C., Hernan
- Page 261 and 262:
Bibliography associated with a soft
- Page 263 and 264:
Bibliography 174. Williams, D.L. an
- Page 265 and 266:
Bibliography Benzalkonium Chloride.
- Page 267 and 268:
Bibliography 206. McKee, S., Townse
- Page 269 and 270:
Bibliography 225. Römling, U., et
- Page 271 and 272:
Appendices Page 250
- Page 273 and 274:
Appendix 1 Appendix 1 -List of Equi
- Page 275 and 276:
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 Table 1: The
- Page 277 and 278:
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 - Table 2: 48
- Page 279 and 280:
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 - Table 3: 48
- Page 281 and 282:
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 - Table 4: 16
- Page 283 and 284:
Appendix 2 Appendix 2 - Table 5: 16
- Page 285 and 286:
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Appendix 3
- Page 287 and 288:
Appendix 4 Dissemination of Researc
- Page 289:
Appendix 4 Poster Presentation at S