13.01.2014 Views

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BUDUĆNOST EUROPE IZMEĐU EMPIRIJSKOG<br />

I SPEKULATIVNOG UNIVERZALIZMA<br />

Kao temeljno obilježje europskog identiteta najčešće se ističe njegov neisključiv<br />

karakter, koji se očituje u svakojako tolerantnoj, otvorenoj i sanjarskoj<br />

retorici proširenja. Izvor takvog misaonog horizonta jest pathos prosvjetiteljskog<br />

univerzalizma. Ipak, izgleda kao da je obveza univerzalizma, kako se u<br />

Europi razumije i izvodi, udarila o svoje granice. Što je teorijski već dugo bilo<br />

jasno, naime da se identitet ne može samo negativno odrediti kao odbacivanje<br />

esencijalizma i retorike otvorenosti, naglašava se u posljednje vrijeme kao neuspjeli<br />

projekt multikulturalizma. U ovom prilogu bit će predstavljen prijedlog<br />

kojim se univerzalizam treba razumjeti spekulativno umjesto empirijski. U odnosu<br />

prema unutra on implicira retoriku asimilacije pojma, u odnosu prema<br />

van reviziju politike proširenja.<br />

WILLIAM SWEET<br />

Department of Philosophy, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada /<br />

Odsjek za filozofiju, Sveučilište St. Francis Xavier, Antagonish, NS, Kanada<br />

RELIGION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY:<br />

SOME MODELS FOR SOUTHEAST EUROPE<br />

One important characteristic of Southeast Europe is that it embraces a range<br />

of religious traditions: for example, Catholic (Western and Eastern rites) and<br />

Orthodox Christian, Muslim, and Jewish populations. An important concern<br />

– one which Southeast Europe shares with much of the rest of Europe and the<br />

Americas – is that of the place of religion within the public sphere of democracies.<br />

In this paper, I review some of the history, and present some models of<br />

the relation of religion and democracy. I argue that while tensions and conflicts<br />

exist between religion and democracy, and are arguably inevitable, democratic<br />

principles and values can be consistent with religion. Democracies can learn<br />

from religion, and religions learn from democracy as well. This is not simply<br />

a matter of learning or developing values, but, more broadly, developing new<br />

ways of meaning, understanding, and living.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!