13.01.2014 Views

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCARELLA AGAINST BOŠKOVIĆ (ADVERSUS<br />

BUSKOVIKIUM): THE FIRST PRINTED ATTACK ON<br />

BOŠKOVIĆ’S THEORY OF FORCES FROM 1754<br />

“Many objections against my theory have been published so far,” Bošković<br />

wrote in the preface of his treatise De materiae divisibilitate printed in 1757.<br />

To these objections he answered in the first part of his Theoria philosophiae<br />

naturalis (1763), dividing them into two groups: “objections against the theory of<br />

forces” (objectiones contra theoriam virium) and “objections against points”<br />

(objectiones contra puncta), avoiding on this occasion to mention his critics.<br />

Who attacked Ruđer Bošković in print? Who was the first to attack Bošković<br />

on the many pages of his book? No answer to this question has been offered<br />

so far.<br />

This was first done by Giambattista Scarella in his textbook Physica generalis<br />

methodo mathematica tractata et in tres tomos distributa. First volume<br />

was published in Brescia in 1754, second in 1756, and third in 1757. Here<br />

I aim to present how Scarella criticised Bošković in the first volume of his<br />

General Physics.<br />

Scarella devoted a whole chapter to the proof of the thesis: “extended continuum<br />

cannot be composed from the non-extended parts” (continuum extensum<br />

ex inextensis componi non potest). Having earlier warned in the preface,<br />

he took the opportunity to “examine also a new system of the composition of<br />

continuum devised by the most learned professor of mathematics Father Buskovikius<br />

from the Society of Jesus.” Indeed, in the paragraph 17 entitled “Systema<br />

P. Buskovik” he targeted his attack on Bošković’s points of matter, as the<br />

renowned Ragusan expounded at the beginning of his treatise Dissertationis de<br />

lumine pars secunda (1748). He was especially puzzled by Bošković’s thesis:<br />

“in bodies we do not allow mathematically continuous extension.” However,<br />

he admitted that Bošković’s theory solves many difficulties surrounding the<br />

continuous quantity.<br />

Bošković’s views caught Scarella’s attention on yet another occasion – in<br />

a lengthy chapter “De virium aestimatione”, in his polemic with the work<br />

Dialogo intorno alle forze vive (Bononiae, 1749) by Vincenzo Riccati, who<br />

expressed his appreciation of Bošković’s sententia on living forces published<br />

in the treatise De viribus vivis (1745).<br />

Key words: Ruđer Bošković, Giambattista Scarella, composition of continuum, points<br />

of matter, mathematically continuous extension, vis viva controversy,<br />

Vincenzo Riccati<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!