Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Programska knjižica - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SCARELLA AGAINST BOŠKOVIĆ (ADVERSUS<br />
BUSKOVIKIUM): THE FIRST PRINTED ATTACK ON<br />
BOŠKOVIĆ’S THEORY OF FORCES FROM 1754<br />
“Many objections against my theory have been published so far,” Bošković<br />
wrote in the preface of his treatise De materiae divisibilitate printed in 1757.<br />
To these objections he answered in the first part of his Theoria philosophiae<br />
naturalis (1763), dividing them into two groups: “objections against the theory of<br />
forces” (objectiones contra theoriam virium) and “objections against points”<br />
(objectiones contra puncta), avoiding on this occasion to mention his critics.<br />
Who attacked Ruđer Bošković in print? Who was the first to attack Bošković<br />
on the many pages of his book? No answer to this question has been offered<br />
so far.<br />
This was first done by Giambattista Scarella in his textbook Physica generalis<br />
methodo mathematica tractata et in tres tomos distributa. First volume<br />
was published in Brescia in 1754, second in 1756, and third in 1757. Here<br />
I aim to present how Scarella criticised Bošković in the first volume of his<br />
General Physics.<br />
Scarella devoted a whole chapter to the proof of the thesis: “extended continuum<br />
cannot be composed from the non-extended parts” (continuum extensum<br />
ex inextensis componi non potest). Having earlier warned in the preface,<br />
he took the opportunity to “examine also a new system of the composition of<br />
continuum devised by the most learned professor of mathematics Father Buskovikius<br />
from the Society of Jesus.” Indeed, in the paragraph 17 entitled “Systema<br />
P. Buskovik” he targeted his attack on Bošković’s points of matter, as the<br />
renowned Ragusan expounded at the beginning of his treatise Dissertationis de<br />
lumine pars secunda (1748). He was especially puzzled by Bošković’s thesis:<br />
“in bodies we do not allow mathematically continuous extension.” However,<br />
he admitted that Bošković’s theory solves many difficulties surrounding the<br />
continuous quantity.<br />
Bošković’s views caught Scarella’s attention on yet another occasion – in<br />
a lengthy chapter “De virium aestimatione”, in his polemic with the work<br />
Dialogo intorno alle forze vive (Bononiae, 1749) by Vincenzo Riccati, who<br />
expressed his appreciation of Bošković’s sententia on living forces published<br />
in the treatise De viribus vivis (1745).<br />
Key words: Ruđer Bošković, Giambattista Scarella, composition of continuum, points<br />
of matter, mathematically continuous extension, vis viva controversy,<br />
Vincenzo Riccati<br />
166