11.03.2014 Views

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

phenol: chlor<strong>of</strong>orm method as described above to get rid <strong>of</strong> DNase removal reagent.<br />

The RNA was then quantified and precipitated <strong>by</strong> ethanol precipitation and then redissolved<br />

in appropriate volume <strong>of</strong> nuclease free water so as to obtain a RNA<br />

concentration appropriate for the application (for microarrays the concentration was<br />

maintained at around 6 μg/ml and for all other applications at 1 μg/ml). The quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the RNA was checked <strong>by</strong> agarose gel electrophoresis and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.<br />

2.2.12 Microarray hybridization<br />

Whole genome E.coli K12 cDNA microarrays used in this study were purchased from<br />

MWG biotech (E.coli K12 arrays) & Ocimum biosolutions (E.coli K12 OciChip). The<br />

cDNA synthesis was performed as described in the MWG/Ocimum’s standardized<br />

protocols. After cDNA synthesis, the hybridization was performed in a moist chamber,<br />

at a temperature <strong>of</strong> 42 o C and with a mild shaking (40 rpm) for 16 to 18 hours. After<br />

hybridization the microarray slides are subjected to three consecutive washing steps as<br />

describe in the manual. Then the slides were dried and scanned at two wavelengths,<br />

550nm for Cy3 and 640nm for Cy5, using ScanExpress confocal laser scanner<br />

(PerkinElmer). The scanner <strong>gene</strong>rates TIFF images <strong>of</strong> the microarray with individual<br />

spots showing relative amounts <strong>of</strong> Cy3 and Cy5 in each spot. Images were quantified<br />

using freely available Spotfinder s<strong>of</strong>tware from TIGR [Saeed et al., 2003]. Figure 9<br />

shows a schematic representation <strong>of</strong> the microarray experiment.<br />

The experiment was always carried out with two biological and technical<br />

replicates. The wild-type and the fis comparison shown below when repeated <strong>by</strong><br />

interchanging the Cy3 to fis mutant and Cy5 to wild-type forms a technical replicate<br />

while a biological replicate is when the whole microarray experiment is repeated anew<br />

staring from the bacterial culture. Each biological replicate consists <strong>of</strong> at least one<br />

technical replicate.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!