11.03.2014 Views

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

Coordinated regulation of gene expression by E ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DISCUSSION<br />

4.3.2 Mechanism <strong>of</strong> transcriptional activation <strong>of</strong> the tyrT promoter<br />

Stable RNA promoters in E. coli are both highly regulated and show a high maximal<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> transcription initiation. The tyrT UAS is necessary for optimal <strong>expression</strong> in vivo<br />

[Lamond & Travers, 1983] and can activate transcription in both FIS-dependent and<br />

independent modes. In vitro the tyrT UAS increases the affinity <strong>of</strong> the polymerase for<br />

the promoter [Sander et al., 1993] and has been inferred to make a contact with RNA<br />

polymerase at positions around -120 to -130 on a negatively supercoiled DNA template<br />

[Pemberton et al., 2002]. We note that using conditions where we would expect this<br />

contact to be formed efficiently we do not observe untwisting <strong>of</strong> the -10 region in the<br />

wild-type promoter (Figure 21A), although the -10 hexamer is contacted prior to the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> the upstream contact [Pemberton et al., 2002]. However, untwisting does<br />

occur in the presence <strong>of</strong> FIS (Figure 21A). This is consistent with both previous<br />

observation that FIS facilitates DNA untwisting in the -10 region in the presence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

initiating NTPs [Muskhelishvili et al., 1997] and also with other observations that FIS<br />

can rescue the impaired activity <strong>of</strong> a promoter with down mutation in the -10 region<br />

[Lazarus & Travers, 1993] and <strong>of</strong> a mutant RNA polymerase whose binding to the rrnB<br />

P1 promoter is destabilized [Bartlett et al., 2000]. The finding that the -35U and spacer<br />

mutants simultaneously lose the dependence on negative superhelicity and the<br />

requirement for the UAS in vivo suggests that these mutations overcome wholly or<br />

partially the barrier imposed <strong>by</strong> the wild-type promoter organization and hence abolish<br />

the requirement for activation <strong>by</strong> the UAS alone or <strong>by</strong> FIS bound to the UAS. The UAS<br />

thus acts primarily as a regulatory region with a distinct DNA geometry that is sensitive<br />

to the superhelical density <strong>of</strong> the DNA template [Travers & Muskhelishvili, 1998].<br />

Stabilization <strong>of</strong> this geometry <strong>by</strong> FIS buffers polymerase function against variations in<br />

negative superhelicity. Provision <strong>of</strong> such a buffer <strong>by</strong> FIS operates both for the tyrT<br />

promoter (this work) and also for the rrnA P1 promoter [Rochman et al., 2002]. We<br />

would expect this mechanism to be common to all promoters <strong>of</strong> similar organization.<br />

From the data here we infer that the regulated step in transcription initiation at the tyrT<br />

and possibly other stable RNA promoters is the untwisting <strong>of</strong> the -10 region, a step<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!