30.06.2014 Views

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Radiolo g y <strong>and</strong> Ultrasono graphy<br />

Fig. 2-97 A 7-year-old female Springer Spaniel with a history of having swallowed a fish hook 2 days<br />

earlier. On this lateral thoracic radiograph the fish hook is readily identified dorsal to the heart base.<br />

There is a soft-tissue density surrounding the fish hook, <strong>and</strong> there is gas in the soft tissues dorsal to<br />

this density (arrows). The radiographic findings indicate perforation of the esophagus by the fish<br />

hook, with air within the mediastinum. Th e soft-tissue density that surrounds the fish hook may<br />

represent bait that was on the fish hook at the time it was swallowed. Diagnosis: Fish hook in the thoracic<br />

esophagus with penetration of the mucosa. The fish hook was removed by endoscopy.<br />

Additional air was present in the mediastinum after removal of the fish hook. A contrast esophagram<br />

was performed 3 days after foreign body removal <strong>and</strong> there was no evidence of leakage of contrast<br />

material at the site of foreign body perforation. No complications were encountered.<br />

the heart base, or cranial to the esophageal hiatus (Figs. 2-97 to 2-99). 251,252<br />

Identification of these foreign objects on the ventrodorsal radiograph is often difficult<br />

because of the overlying vertebral column. Esophageal dilation cranial to the foreign<br />

object may provide a clue to its presence, but an esophageal contrast study may be necessary<br />

to outline it. If an esophageal foreign body is identified or suspected, the thoracic<br />

radiograph must be evaluated carefully for evidence of mediastinal or pleural fluid <strong>and</strong><br />

air, which indicate esophageal perforation. Aspiration pneumonia may be present if the<br />

animal has been vomiting. The preferred method for performing an esophageal contrast<br />

study in situations in which there is a likelihood or suspicion of esophageal perforation<br />

should involve a water-soluble, nonionic contrast medium, because there is less potential<br />

damage that could be inflicted on the lung should the patient aspirate the material. An<br />

ionic water-soluble medium also could be used. 254 If the results of that study were negative,<br />

a follow-up study with liquid barium should be considered to evaluate for occult<br />

leaks. The contrast studies may not demonstrate contrast leakage despite noncontrast<br />

radiographic evidence of esophageal perforation because of adhesions or fibrosis, which<br />

may partially seal the perforation. 255 Esophagoscopy is the preferred method to delineate<br />

an esophageal perforation.<br />

E S O P H AG E A L F I S T U L A S<br />

Tracheoesophageal <strong>and</strong> bronchoesophageal fistulas are rare in dogs <strong>and</strong> cats. 256-261<br />

Mediastinal or pleural fluid or a localized pulmonary infiltrate may be observed in association<br />

with these fistulas. However, there may be no survey radiographic findings suggestive<br />

of a fistula despite notable clinical signs. The diagnosis requires demonstration of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!