30.06.2014 Views

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas and Text

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236 <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Animal</strong> Radiolo g y <strong>and</strong> Ultrasono graphy<br />

Fig. 2-226 Sagittal ultrasonogram<br />

of the right thyroid gl<strong>and</strong> in an 8-<br />

year-old spayed female Keeshond<br />

with hypercalcemia. Within the<br />

ovoid thyroid gl<strong>and</strong> (black arrows),<br />

there is a hypoechoic nodule near its<br />

anterior pole (white arrows).<br />

Diagnosis: Parathyroid mass confirmed<br />

as parathyroid tumor.<br />

muscles <strong>and</strong> laryngeal muscles, or a sensory defect that does not allow the animal to detect<br />

the presence of food within the pharynx. Both liquid barium <strong>and</strong> barium-impregnated<br />

food should be used when studying animals with oropharyngeal disorders. Again,<br />

because of the complex nature of swallowing, static radiographs rarely produce a definite<br />

diagnosis.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Spencer CP, Ackerman N, Burt JK: The canine lateral thoracic radiograph.<br />

Vet Radiol 1981; 22:262.<br />

2. Forrest LJ: <strong>Radiology</strong> corner—advantages of the three view thoracic<br />

radiographic examination in instances other than metastasis. Vet<br />

Radiol 1992; 33:340.<br />

3. Biller DS, Myer CW: Case examples demonstrating the clinical utility<br />

of obtaining both right <strong>and</strong> left lateral thoracic radiographs in<br />

small animals. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23:381.<br />

4. Lang L, Wortman JA, Glickman LT, et al: Sensitivity of radiographic<br />

detection of lung metastases in the dog. Vet Radiol 1986; 27:74.<br />

5. Barthez PY, Hornof WJ, Theon AP, et al: Receiver operating characteristic<br />

curve analysis of the performance of various radiographic<br />

protocols when screening dogs for pulmonary metastases. J Am Vet<br />

Med Assoc 1994; 204:237.<br />

6. Gr<strong>and</strong>age J: Posture, gravity, <strong>and</strong> radiologic interpretation. J Am Vet<br />

Radiol Soc 1979; 22:80.<br />

7. Ahlberg NE, Hoppe F, Kelter U, et al: A computed tomographic study<br />

of volume <strong>and</strong> x-ray attenuation of the lungs of beagles in various<br />

body positions. Vet Radiol 1985; 26:43.<br />

8. Pechman RD: Effect of dependency versus nondependency on lung<br />

lesion visualization. Vet Radiol 1987; 28:185.<br />

9. Steyn PF, Green RW: How patient positioning affects radiographic<br />

signs of canine lung disease. Vet Med 1990; 85:796.<br />

10. Gr<strong>and</strong>age J: The radiology of the dog’s diaphragm. J Sm Anim Pract<br />

1974; 15:1.<br />

11. Suter PF: Radiographic examination. In Ettinger SJ, Suter PF, eds:<br />

Canine cardiology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1970; p 40.<br />

12. Suter PF: Thoracic radiography: a text atlas of thoracic diseases in<br />

the dog <strong>and</strong> cat. Peter F Suter, Wettswil, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, 1984.<br />

13. Carlisle CH, Thrall DE: A comparison of normal feline thoracic radiographs<br />

made in dorsal versus ventral recumbency. Vet Radiol 1982;<br />

23:3.<br />

14. Ruehl WW, Thrall DE: The effect of dorsal versus ventral recumbency<br />

on the radiographic appearance of the canine thorax. Vet<br />

Radiol 1981; 22:10.<br />

15. Holmes RA, Smith FG, Lewis RE, et al: The effects of rotation on the<br />

radiographic appearance of the canine cardiac silhouette in dorsal<br />

recumbency. Vet Radiol 1985; 26:98.<br />

16. Silverman S, Suter PF: Influence of inspiration <strong>and</strong> expiration on<br />

canine thoracic radiographs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975; 166:502.<br />

17. Godshalk CP: Common pitfalls in radiographic interpretation of the<br />

thorax. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1994; 16:731.<br />

18. Losonsky JM, Kneller SK: Misdiagnosis in normal radiographic<br />

anatomy: eight structural configurations simulating disease entities<br />

in dogs <strong>and</strong> cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191:109.<br />

19. Fox PR, Bond BR, Peterson ME: Echocardiographic reference values<br />

in healthy cats sedated with ketamine hydrochloride. Am J Vet Res<br />

1985; 46:1479.<br />

20. R<strong>and</strong> JS, Reynolds WT, Priest J: Echocardiographic evaluation of<br />

the effects of medetomidine <strong>and</strong> xylazine in dogs. Aust Vet J 1996;<br />

73:41.<br />

21. Moise NS: Echocardiography. In Fox PR, ed: Canine <strong>and</strong> feline cardiology.<br />

Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1988; p 114.<br />

22. Nyl<strong>and</strong> TG, Matton JS, Allen AK, et al: Veterinary diagnostic ultrasound.<br />

WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1995.<br />

23. Thomas WP: Two-dimensional, real-time echocardiography in the<br />

dog: technique <strong>and</strong> anatomic validation. Vet Radiol 1984; 25:50.<br />

24. Thomas WP, Gaber CE, Jacobs GJ, et al: Recommendations for st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

in transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in the dog<br />

<strong>and</strong> cat. J Vet Intern Med 1993; 7:247.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!