04.07.2014 Views

FY 2012 Operating Budget and FY 2013-2017 Financial ... - Septa

FY 2012 Operating Budget and FY 2013-2017 Financial ... - Septa

FY 2012 Operating Budget and FY 2013-2017 Financial ... - Septa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Service Stabilization Fund<br />

Prior to passage of Act 44 in July 2007, the Governor established the Transportation Funding<br />

<strong>and</strong> Reform Commission. The Commission identified future operating <strong>and</strong> capital funding<br />

needs for highways <strong>and</strong> transit. Act 44 represented a major milestone for transit funding in<br />

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The intent of this legislation was to create a long term<br />

funding source which was stable, predictable <strong>and</strong> with growth potential.<br />

Until Act 44 passed, the majority of state operating subsidies were subject to the annual<br />

budget appropriations process. During the decade prior to Act 44, growth in operating<br />

subsidies was very limited. SEPTA, along with all public transit agencies in the<br />

Commonwealth, experienced very difficult challenges in balancing their operating budgets.<br />

In a number of years, SEPTA proposed significant fare increases <strong>and</strong> severe service<br />

reductions as initial measures to balance the Authority’s budget. Through a number of onetime<br />

actions, the majority of these actions became unnecessary.<br />

As the Act 44 funding program is intended to provide a long-term solution to operating<br />

subsidy requirements, it is critically important for SEPTA to budget the subsidy funds to<br />

ensure that this objective is achieved. The Service Stabilization Fund is necessary to: 1)<br />

ensure long-term fiscal stability for SEPTA’s operating budget; 2) prevent a future budget<br />

crisis; <strong>and</strong> 3) maintain service levels. Based on future projected growth in Act 44 funding<br />

<strong>and</strong> the projected growth in SEPTA’s operating expenses <strong>and</strong> revenues, there will be fiscal<br />

years in which the growth in expenses will exceed the growth in Act 44 funding. In those<br />

years the Service Stabilization Fund will be used to balance the operating budget avoiding<br />

substantial fare increases <strong>and</strong>/or service cuts. Therefore, prudent fiscal management<br />

requires that SEPTA maintain the Service Stabilization Fund to pay for future operating<br />

expenses when operating subsidy needs inevitably exceed the Act 44 subsidy funds<br />

allocated to SEPTA in a specific year.<br />

SEPTA was required to use $26 million from the Service Stabilization account in Fiscal Year<br />

2010 to balance the operating budget. SEPTA deposited $20.4 million in the Service<br />

Stabilization account in <strong>FY</strong> 2011, as a result of increased ridership revenue. It is projected<br />

that SEPTA will be required to use additional Service Stabilization funds in Fiscal Years <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>2013</strong> in order to balance the operating budget.<br />

SEPTA Fiscal Year <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Operating</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!