08.11.2014 Views

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Emerging Response Tools for Chemical and Biological Agents<br />

Instructors: Steve Allgeier, EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water<br />

Kathy Clayton, EPA ORD, NHSRC<br />

Mark Durno, EPA Region 5<br />

Kevin Garrahan, EPA ORD, NHSRC<br />

Deborah McKean, EPA NDT<br />

Tonya Nichols, EPA ORD, NHSRC<br />

Curtis Snook, EPA NDT<br />

Cindy Sonich-Mullin, EPA ORD, NHSRC<br />

Oba Vincent, EPA ORD, NHSRC<br />

This course provided information and tools to help <strong>OSC</strong>s respond quickly and efficiently to WMD<br />

incidents. This class combined the decision-making processes of emergency response and risk<br />

assessment with the tools and techniques that provide for rapid communication and informed risk<br />

management of chemicals and biological agents. An emergency consequence assessment tool was used<br />

to demonstrate consequence assessment during an emergency. Topics included:<br />

• Process toward validated sampling and analysis of WMDs for clearance sampling, remediation,<br />

and restoration.<br />

• Biodetection: screening technologies and an introduction to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)<br />

and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).<br />

• Support for Environmental Rapid Risk Assessment database and the Data Dictionary: rapid<br />

access to agent-specific information.<br />

• Knowing your numbers: Health-based criteria and provisional advisory levels.<br />

• How clean is clean?: State of current policy.<br />

• Emergency consequence assessment for water systems.<br />

• What can we do for you?: Introduction to the TRIO Workgroup.<br />

Participation and Average Grade<br />

Number of Participants Who<br />

Pre-registered<br />

Number of Participants Who<br />

Signed Course Roster<br />

Number of <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Forms Submitted<br />

Average<br />

Grade<br />

102 96 51 4*<br />

* The grade displayed is the average of the grades provided on the evaluation forms, where<br />

1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, and 5 = Excellent.<br />

C-46 Comments about Individual Training Courses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!