OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Participants by Job Title<br />
EPA NDT, 6% (2)<br />
EPA RPMs, 3% (1)<br />
Other Federal Agency<br />
Representatives, 11% (4)<br />
EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 8% (3)<br />
EPA HQ Representatives,<br />
11% (4)<br />
State Representatives,<br />
14% (5)<br />
EPA ERT, 3% (1)<br />
EPA CICs, 3% (1)<br />
Other EPA Regional<br />
Removal Staff, 41% (15)<br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• A good introduction to EPA regulations.<br />
Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />
• Instructor did an excellent job of making the topic interesting and kept participants’ attention.<br />
(Eleven responses)<br />
• Reference CD is an excellent resource. (Four responses)<br />
• Please do not assume that we are <strong>OSC</strong>s. Some of us are RSC, so our knowledge may or may not<br />
be limited.<br />
• Too many undefined abbreviations (e.g., EHS).<br />
• Missing well-classification slide (SDWA) and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards table<br />
slide.<br />
• Pace of the course was a little too fast.<br />
Comments on course name and abstract expectations<br />
• Excellent. (Three responses)<br />
Comments on recommending course to colleagues<br />
• A great course for all EPA employees because it is a good review of regulations. (Three<br />
responses)<br />
• I would recommend the course to a pollution investigation trainee.<br />
• This course must be offered next year for future <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness attendees.<br />
C-121 Comments about Individual Training Courses
Change language