08.11.2014 Views

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

RadNET Deployables<br />

Instructors: Dan Askren, EPA National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory<br />

Michael Messer, EPA ORIA<br />

This basic 4-hour training course focused on the use and requirements for deploying RadNET, a<br />

nationwide environmental radiation monitoring system, during or after a radiological event. RadNET,<br />

previously called Environmental Radiation Ambient Monitoring System, supports the Agency’s role in<br />

assessing the impacts of a radiological incident and focuses on monitoring potential impacts on<br />

populations and public health. “Fixed” stations routinely sample drinking water, precipitation, and milk;<br />

and provide continuous air monitoring. “Deployable” stations may be used after an emergency to<br />

improve air monitoring coverage over large areas.<br />

The hands-on training covered placement, setup, operation, and disassembly of the RadNet Deployable<br />

air monitoring units. Participants received training in the following areas:<br />

• Overview of how and where deployables will be used during an emergency.<br />

• Health and safety considerations for personnel deploying the monitors.<br />

• Basics of radiation detection.<br />

• Overview of siting and placement criteria.<br />

The instructional methodology for this course consisted of lecture and a hands-on exercise. The target<br />

audience for this course was RSC staff with little or no radiological experience and who are willing and<br />

able to undertake field work.<br />

Number of Participants Who<br />

Pre-registered<br />

Participation and Average Grade<br />

Number of Participants Who<br />

Signed Course Roster<br />

Number of <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

Forms Submitted<br />

Average<br />

Grade<br />

41 27 15 5*<br />

* The grade displayed is the average of the grades provided on the evaluation forms, where<br />

1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, and 5 = Excellent.<br />

Summary of <strong>Evaluation</strong> Results<br />

100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

25%<br />

0%<br />

Overall, the presentation<br />

of the course was<br />

appropriate for my level<br />

of experience.<br />

The content of the<br />

course is relevant to my<br />

job responsibilities.<br />

The course had a good<br />

balance of lecture<br />

material, visual aids,<br />

case studies, and<br />

discussion time.<br />

The handout materials<br />

were clear, legible, and<br />

helpful.<br />

The course materials will<br />

be useful as a reference<br />

for my job.<br />

This course should<br />

continue to be offered at<br />

future training programs.<br />

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A<br />

C-95 Comments about Individual Training Courses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!