08.11.2014 Views

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />

have been combined and paraphrased.<br />

Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />

• I do a lot of field sampling and the material will certainly help with my job. (Two responses)<br />

• I found the final presentation on more efficient data collection design to be very informative and<br />

expect it to help me to do a better job.<br />

• More applicable to remediations and long-term removal actions than emergencies.<br />

Comments on course content<br />

• Case studies were valuable. (Two responses)<br />

• Course would benefit from more case studies and removal driven talks.<br />

• Course was over analytical and needs more practical application.<br />

• Course was too heavy on statistics. (Three responses)<br />

• Good course for preliminary assessment/site inspection, remedial investigation/feasibility study,<br />

but not for the <strong>OSC</strong>.<br />

• Information should be more practical and applicable to field sampling used by <strong>OSC</strong>s. (Two<br />

responses)<br />

Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />

• Pace was good. Outlines and wrap-up are always a great strategy.<br />

• Cut down on number of slides.<br />

• Too much information for amount of class time. (Four responses)<br />

• Handouts were unorganized, did not follow the presentations, and some slides were missing.<br />

(Seventeen responses)<br />

• Presentation was unorganized and difficult to follow. (Four responses)<br />

• Phone lecture was difficult to hear and understand. (Four responses)<br />

• Course was heavy on lecture. More teaching methods need to be employed. (Two responses)<br />

• Course should be longer than one day. (Three responses)<br />

Comments on recommending course to colleagues<br />

• Yes, if modifications are made. (Three responses)<br />

• Yes, to ones who are more experienced in sampling.<br />

• Yes, to a new RPM maybe. Course not useful in emergency response context.<br />

• Good course for an RPM.<br />

Attendee’s suggestions for future course offerings<br />

• Topics to shorten:<br />

- Statistics, especially the USP model<br />

• Topics to lengthen:<br />

- How the Triad approach can be used in removals<br />

C-24 Comments about Individual Training Courses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!