OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />
• I do a lot of field sampling and the material will certainly help with my job. (Two responses)<br />
• I found the final presentation on more efficient data collection design to be very informative and<br />
expect it to help me to do a better job.<br />
• More applicable to remediations and long-term removal actions than emergencies.<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• Case studies were valuable. (Two responses)<br />
• Course would benefit from more case studies and removal driven talks.<br />
• Course was over analytical and needs more practical application.<br />
• Course was too heavy on statistics. (Three responses)<br />
• Good course for preliminary assessment/site inspection, remedial investigation/feasibility study,<br />
but not for the <strong>OSC</strong>.<br />
• Information should be more practical and applicable to field sampling used by <strong>OSC</strong>s. (Two<br />
responses)<br />
Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />
• Pace was good. Outlines and wrap-up are always a great strategy.<br />
• Cut down on number of slides.<br />
• Too much information for amount of class time. (Four responses)<br />
• Handouts were unorganized, did not follow the presentations, and some slides were missing.<br />
(Seventeen responses)<br />
• Presentation was unorganized and difficult to follow. (Four responses)<br />
• Phone lecture was difficult to hear and understand. (Four responses)<br />
• Course was heavy on lecture. More teaching methods need to be employed. (Two responses)<br />
• Course should be longer than one day. (Three responses)<br />
Comments on recommending course to colleagues<br />
• Yes, if modifications are made. (Three responses)<br />
• Yes, to ones who are more experienced in sampling.<br />
• Yes, to a new RPM maybe. Course not useful in emergency response context.<br />
• Good course for an RPM.<br />
Attendee’s suggestions for future course offerings<br />
• Topics to shorten:<br />
- Statistics, especially the USP model<br />
• Topics to lengthen:<br />
- How the Triad approach can be used in removals<br />
C-24 Comments about Individual Training Courses