OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Participants by Job Title<br />
Other Federal Agency<br />
Representatives, 4% (2)<br />
EPA NDT, 2% (1)<br />
EPA Removal Managers,<br />
7% (4)<br />
Other EPA Regional<br />
Removal Staff, 21% (12)<br />
EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 54% (31)<br />
EPA HQ Representatives,<br />
12% (7)<br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />
• Very helpful handouts.<br />
• The field accounting material is of particular help. (Two responses)<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• Great material.<br />
• Case studies would help to illustrate the dos and don’ts in unusual or unique situations.<br />
• Would be great to break Removal Cost Management System (RCMS) out as a separate class.<br />
• Could have more new material to increase knowledge.<br />
• The course can definitely be upgraded to tougher material.<br />
• Topics to be shortened: streamline new procurement initiatives.<br />
• Topics to be lengthened: performance-based contracts; “Field Experienced” speakers;<br />
performance-based service contracting (PBSC) discussion - use this forum to get input from<br />
<strong>OSC</strong>s; RCMS - cost accounting.<br />
• Topics to be omitted: Headquarters’ discussion on performance contracts; RCMS overview.<br />
• Topics to be added: how to manage contractors’ hours; module for dealing with contractors and<br />
ICS system; information relating to actual sites of constructing issues.<br />
Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />
• Rick and Art were excellent! (Two responses)<br />
• Good mix of Headquarters and regional presenters.<br />
• Discussion was very involved and helpful.<br />
C-4 Comments about Individual Training Courses