OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Participation and Average Grade<br />
February 13, 9:00 a.m.<br />
Number of Participants Who<br />
Pre-registered<br />
Number of Participants Who<br />
Signed Course Roster<br />
Number of <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />
Forms Submitted<br />
Average<br />
Grade<br />
31 28 17 4*<br />
February 13, 1:30 p.m.<br />
Number of Participants Who<br />
Pre-registered<br />
Number of Participants Who<br />
Signed Course Roster<br />
Number of <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />
Forms Submitted<br />
Average<br />
Grade<br />
36 23 13 4*<br />
* The grade displayed is the average of the grades provided on the evaluation forms, where<br />
1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, and 5 = Excellent.<br />
Summary of <strong>Evaluation</strong> Results<br />
(February 13, 9:00 a.m.)<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
0%<br />
Overall, the presentation<br />
of the course was<br />
appropriate for my level<br />
of experience.<br />
The content of the<br />
course is relevant to my<br />
job responsibilities.<br />
The course had a good<br />
balance of lecture<br />
material, visual aids,<br />
case studies, and<br />
discussion time.<br />
The handout materials<br />
were clear, legible, and<br />
helpful.<br />
The course materials will<br />
be useful as a reference<br />
for my job.<br />
This course should<br />
continue to be offered at<br />
future training programs.<br />
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree N/A<br />
C-110 Comments about Individual Training Courses