08.11.2014 Views

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Participants by Job Title<br />

EPA RPMs, 1% (1)<br />

Local Responders, 1% (1)<br />

EPA NDT, 1% (1)<br />

Other Federal Agency<br />

Representatives, 21% (16)<br />

EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 36% (28)<br />

State Representatives, 5% (4)<br />

EPA ERT, 3% (2)<br />

EPA Removal Managers,<br />

4% (3)<br />

Other EPA Regional<br />

Removal Staff, 19% (15)<br />

EPA HQ Representatives,<br />

9% (7)<br />

Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />

have been combined and paraphrased.<br />

Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />

• The content of this course is my job and I need to hear it again and again. (Three responses)<br />

• This course clearly explained the responsibilities and roles of each agency in relation to the NCP.<br />

• I am in public affairs and it always helps to have a deeper understanding of the work completed<br />

within EPA.<br />

• I work in 311 enforcement.<br />

Comments on course content<br />

• Good introduction to the NCP. (Two responses)<br />

• Comprehensive, complete, short!<br />

• Good information for decision making.<br />

• Good use of case studies. (Two responses)<br />

• Since I am not an <strong>OSC</strong>, more information on the NCP would have been helpful, but I found the<br />

course very interesting and useful. (Two responses)<br />

• Course will eventually need a module that attempts to reconcile the NCP with ICS.<br />

• Add more case studies. (Four responses)<br />

• Simplify course by providing examples of what you can and cannot do for many situations. Then<br />

discuss the NCP.<br />

• The repetition of some material could be shortened, such as national trustees and health and<br />

safety requirements.<br />

• Course did not go into enough detail.<br />

C-74 Comments about Individual Training Courses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!