OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Participants by Job Title<br />
EPA RPMs, 1% (1)<br />
Local Responders, 1% (1)<br />
EPA NDT, 1% (1)<br />
Other Federal Agency<br />
Representatives, 21% (16)<br />
EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 36% (28)<br />
State Representatives, 5% (4)<br />
EPA ERT, 3% (2)<br />
EPA Removal Managers,<br />
4% (3)<br />
Other EPA Regional<br />
Removal Staff, 19% (15)<br />
EPA HQ Representatives,<br />
9% (7)<br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />
• The content of this course is my job and I need to hear it again and again. (Three responses)<br />
• This course clearly explained the responsibilities and roles of each agency in relation to the NCP.<br />
• I am in public affairs and it always helps to have a deeper understanding of the work completed<br />
within EPA.<br />
• I work in 311 enforcement.<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• Good introduction to the NCP. (Two responses)<br />
• Comprehensive, complete, short!<br />
• Good information for decision making.<br />
• Good use of case studies. (Two responses)<br />
• Since I am not an <strong>OSC</strong>, more information on the NCP would have been helpful, but I found the<br />
course very interesting and useful. (Two responses)<br />
• Course will eventually need a module that attempts to reconcile the NCP with ICS.<br />
• Add more case studies. (Four responses)<br />
• Simplify course by providing examples of what you can and cannot do for many situations. Then<br />
discuss the NCP.<br />
• The repetition of some material could be shortened, such as national trustees and health and<br />
safety requirements.<br />
• Course did not go into enough detail.<br />
C-74 Comments about Individual Training Courses