OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Participants by Job Title<br />
Local Responders, 2% (1)<br />
EPA NDT, 5% (2)<br />
Other Federal Agency<br />
Representatives, 17% (7)<br />
EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 38% (16)<br />
State Representatives,<br />
29% (12)<br />
EPA ERT, 2% (1)<br />
EPA CICs, 2% (1)<br />
Other EPA Regional<br />
Removal Staff, 5% (2)<br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />
• Course was very relevant to my job because Region 4 has a lot of mercury spills.<br />
• Course was based on real experience and lessons learned, which lends credibility to the<br />
information and makes it pertinent to my job.<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• One of the best courses this week.<br />
• Informative. (Two responses)<br />
• Case studies were great. (Two responses)<br />
• As you continue to offer the course, refresh the material and add recent case studies and lessons<br />
learned.<br />
Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />
• Excellent! (Eight responses)<br />
• Presentations and materials useful.<br />
• Presenters spoke well and the audience was engaged. (Four responses)<br />
• ATSDR was great.<br />
• CD/DVD was excellent and will be helpful for sharing with co-workers. (Three responses)<br />
• Some slides were not included in handbook and it would have been nice to have them in class for<br />
note taking.<br />
• Pace of course was a little fast.<br />
• Make it a day long course with more case studies.<br />
C-78 Comments about Individual Training Courses