OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
OSC 2007 Evaluation Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
The pie chart below illustrates the percentages of students for the training course by job title. EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s<br />
and other regional removal and emergency response support staff represented 64 percent of the students.<br />
Fifteen members of the RSC attended this course.<br />
Participants by Job Title<br />
EPA RPMs, 12% (3)<br />
EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 12% (3)<br />
Other Federal Agency<br />
Representatives, 4% (1)<br />
EPA HQ Representatives,<br />
20% (5)<br />
Other EPA Regional<br />
Removal Staff, 52% (13)<br />
Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />
have been combined and paraphrased.<br />
Comments on course relevance to job responsibilities<br />
• As an <strong>OSC</strong>, this is not my regular job.<br />
Comments on course content<br />
• Very good course.<br />
• Great hands on class! (Two responses)<br />
• Believe the course material was overly simplified.<br />
• Material is relevant for air monitoring RSC only. (Three responses)<br />
Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />
• Hard to read screen shot copies.<br />
• Consolidate operation material.<br />
Comments on course name and abstract expectations<br />
• Course abstract should state the course focuses on setting up and putting together the equipment.<br />
• Abstract should indicate that it is appropriate for RSC.<br />
Comments on recommending course to colleagues<br />
• This course needs to be done at future <strong>OSC</strong> training programs.<br />
C-96 Comments about Individual Training Courses