08.11.2014 Views

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

OSC 2007 Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2007</strong> <strong>OSC</strong> Readiness Training Program <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

The pie chart below illustrates the percentages of students for the training course by job title. EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s<br />

and other regional removal and emergency response support staff represented 71 percent of the students.<br />

Ten members of the RSC attended this course.<br />

Participants by Job Title<br />

Other Federal Agency<br />

Representatives, 11% (6)<br />

EPA ERT, 2% (1)<br />

EPA RPMs, 2% (1)<br />

EPA CICs, 2% (1)<br />

EPA Removal Managers,<br />

2% (1)<br />

EPA <strong>OSC</strong>s, 43% (24)<br />

Other EPA Regional<br />

Removal Staff, 25% (14)<br />

EPA HQ Representatives,<br />

13% (7)<br />

Summarized below are the written comments provided on the evaluation forms. Similar observations<br />

have been combined and paraphrased.<br />

Comments on course content<br />

• Great delivery of the statutes of upcoming changes to NCP implementation.<br />

• USACE and NIMS were the most interesting and informative presentations.<br />

• First section was beyond my technical competence.<br />

• Course was slightly above my experience level (6 months as an <strong>OSC</strong>).<br />

• Include a quick review of the NRP, or at least an outline of the ESFs.<br />

• Include more detail, such as a panel on FEMA.<br />

• Shorten the NRP section; information is dry.<br />

• Course will need to be revised and adjusted based on the current state of our involvement and<br />

changes in federal response plans and organization. (Two responses)<br />

Comments on instructional methods and materials<br />

• Add a panel discussion for a particular parish and specific ideas of what worked, what did not,<br />

suggestions and quick remedies.<br />

• Not enough discussions, case studies or visual aides to break up the lecture; because of this, the<br />

lecture dragged on. (Three responses)<br />

• Go through the standard information quicker.<br />

• Handouts were not helpful or had poor choices in font size and color. (Two responses)<br />

C-118 Comments about Individual Training Courses

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!