23.11.2014 Views

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Put graphically the relative shares of GNP in 1980 in a hypothetical, integrated<br />

economy, compared with how they were with de facto division, look something like<br />

the following (Figure 6.3 below):<br />

Figure 6.3 Actual & projected income in 1980, assuming 1951-63 growth trends<br />

persisi.<br />

C£900 -r<br />

Total Çypriot Greek Cypriot Turkish Çypriot<br />

Sourct: GC (fata: "Staili tìcal Abatncli" (vanoui), "TimeStriti I>ata I960-W.TC data. Biok. H.A. 1993.<br />

The first column shows the combined income of the island as a whole in 1980<br />

(C£863 million 1980 Cyprus Pounds) with the projected income of C£788 million<br />

adjacent to it. The third column shows Greek-Cypriot income<br />

in 1980 (C£787<br />

million) adjacent to its projected share (C£674 million). The fifth column shows the<br />

actual income of the (then) "Turkish Federated State of Northern Cyprus" in 1980<br />

(C£76 million) next to its projected share (C£114 million). The first point to note is<br />

that the actual combined income of the two de facto économies is greater than the<br />

projected income from the no war, no division assumption. However, in 1980<br />

(when Turkish-Cypriot exports peaked as a proportion of imports) they appear to be<br />

50% worse off than they would have been had growth trends persisted, whilst<br />

Greek-Cypriots appear to be 14% better off with de facto division.<br />

297

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!