23.11.2014 Views

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

Download (28Mb) - LSE Theses Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

namely investment rates 54<br />

(in physical capital) are considered paramount, then the<br />

best parallel performance must be offered by the World Bank's "More Developed<br />

Mediterranean" group of économies. A single Cypriot economy could have<br />

experienced an increasing economic rôle of government, like the average Micro<br />

Economy, in the 1964-80 period, or a shrinking rôle of government like the average<br />

Regional Sub-Group economy; either way, growth would be likely to have been<br />

affected. Given the fact that each possible peer group out performs the others in<br />

some correlating experiences with Cyprus until 1964 (Tables 6.3), or offers policy<br />

alternatives in the 1964-80 period, each peer group's mean economic performance<br />

offers a range of potential possibilities for a single Cypriot economy, a range of<br />

benchmarks for a unified, integrated Cypriot economy in 1980.<br />

There are three reasons why the earlier bench-marking stopped in 1980. The first is<br />

that simply extrapolating from past performance does not allow a statistically and /<br />

or historically relevant resuit to be extended beyond a very few years. Another<br />

reason is because 1980 offers a useful cut-off point between recovery from the<br />

effects of war, de facto territorial shifts and separate economic development. 1980 55<br />

appears to be the point at which both économies have recovered from their<br />

respective politicai traumas, so presumably any costs of division can be determined<br />

then. Another reason to end bench-marking in 1980, is because the proxy for allisland<br />

economic development being developed here, the performance of peer<br />

économies, appears to offer a less convincing benchmark at the mean after 1980. A<br />

significantly wider and widening divergence in economic performance occurs<br />

amongst the peers after 1980, in ail three groups (variable 5, Table 6.5); this tallies<br />

with the performance of developing countries more generally 56 . However, the<br />

proposition that without war Cyprus should have done no worse by 1990 than the<br />

lowest average peer group performance, remains temptingly available as a tool to<br />

determine something of the cost of division.<br />

54 ibid.<br />

55 In 1980 Turkish Cypriot exports peaked as a % of GDP, Source: "TRNC", "State" Planning<br />

Organisation. Unpublished National Accounts Statistics. (Under Secretary Ahmet Zeki Bulunc,<br />

1993).<br />

56 Little, Cooper, Corden, & Rajapatirana 1993. op. cit.<br />

332

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!