А. Монастырский, Н. Панитков, И. Макаревич, Е. Елагина, С ...
А. Монастырский, Н. Панитков, И. Макаревич, Е. Елагина, С ...
А. Монастырский, Н. Панитков, И. Макаревич, Е. Елагина, С ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72. LAUNCHING A KITE IN PRORA<br />
S.H.: The launching of a kite can be treated as light sporting activity for seaside outdoorsmen. Or<br />
does this action gain a special taste when backgrounded by romantic Rygen landscape This<br />
background – taking into account the notion ―Haimat‖ (Motherland) – is intensified by architerctural<br />
ensemble of a resort named ―KDF‖ (―power through joy‖), monstrous relicts of Nazi holiday home<br />
named Prora.<br />
A.M.: Clearly, this action is of ―shifted‖, almost oneiroid nature due its location. The depressive<br />
architecture of Prora‘s ―earth-scrapers‖, a sort of ―Anti-New York‖, these grey centipedes are so<br />
inspiring esthetically that any action seems useless before them, as there‘s always something else to<br />
see. In a place like Prora, a place of unfinished rituals, any action is forced to be come ritual. This<br />
necessarily involves mass ritual gatherings in its central part. The oneiroid side lies in the fact that<br />
while launching the kite I felt some forced action, partially or not controlled at all, like in dreams. For<br />
me personally there was no ―side‖ view, I acted as a machine, or, more exactly, as its part. That is,<br />
probably, the reason why I got this ―schizophrenical‖ trauma of fingers from the revolving drum with<br />
the line to which the kite was attached.<br />
S.H. I want to add several details to this description. I think that Prora‘s architecture cannot be treated<br />
unanbiguously, and that gives the opportunity of suspension, in either touristic meaning or historical.<br />
You are right when you speak of depressive minimalism which is created by the construction‘s<br />
immensity, closed facades stretching almost five kilometers in a huge line along the seashore, without<br />
any color shades or architectural diversities – I mean dull repetitions without rhythmical variations<br />
which are especially magnified in contrast with diverse and agile forms of the sea waves and<br />
rhythmical rotation of trees along an alley when you are driving by it in a car. All this is true. But the<br />
functionality of Bauhaus style is also there. The complex is designed so that the windows of each and<br />
every vacationer (20000 persons in total) faced the sea. Besides that, the project included different<br />
verandas, cafeteria etc., as architectural details and ornament. Therefore, the original project<br />
suggested some diversity, but it was never realized because of the war. It is important to know that in<br />
the central part a huge neo-classical hall also wasn‘t realized. And what we were left with is the<br />
empty center for action.<br />
A.M. That‘s what I‘m talking about – the action, I mean the launching of the kite, was performed in<br />
the empty sacred center. Actually, this hall used to host mass gatherings of ideological purpose. No<br />
kite launches were supposed here. Every action is first of all compared to its location and is even<br />
somewhat determined by them. An actionist is attracted by the place in the same way as an artist is<br />
attracted by canvas, but while the painter works with colors and brushes, i.e. his choice is rather<br />
limited, the actionist is perfectly free in instrumental sense, at least at first sight. He seems to be be<br />
able to use anything he wants. But in fact I‘m not completely sure that it is really so. Some archaical<br />
mechanism seems to be working here that ―gathers up‖ a certain instrumentation for the action and<br />
then ―guides‖ the actionist to the place where this instrumentation is used. Therefore, it is rather<br />
difficult to tell actionist activity from ritual or magic, although there certainly is some esthetical<br />
autonomy.<br />
S.H. Here the ambivalent intension between the mass scale and elitism is also important. Prora was<br />
designed as a specimen of mass resorts – ―leisure free for all‖. This tradition can be traced until our<br />
days. In fact, Prora has always been a closed area. Many legends and gossips surround this place. The<br />
Red army showed up here after the war, they tried to blow up some parts of the ensemble, thinking<br />
that they could be somehow connected with rocket building facilities in Penemunde (perhaps they<br />
didn‘t quite understand that this building was a resort). According to other gossip, there was some<br />
sort of submarine dock, some underwater subway for transporting the vacationers from the residential<br />
complex to the festive hall. It was also said that an exact copy of this complex resided somewhere in<br />
Argentina. In the times of German Democratic Republic this resort used to host military barracks.<br />
After the reunion Western military men would re-educate their Eastern colleagues there. And only<br />
last year this place became accessible to public. I could also say that the launching of a kite happened<br />
at the moment of ―unsealing‖ of this place.