08.01.2015 Views

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFMAN 11-217V1 3 JANUARY 2005 173<br />

8.5.4.4.7. Final Approach Direction. The arrow shows the direction the final<br />

approach brings you in relation to the runway. This information can help you<br />

know where to look for the runway. It is also useful in determining how much<br />

maneuvering may be required to align the aircraft with the runway. A straight-in<br />

approach may bring your aircraft to the runway as much as 30 degrees off of the<br />

runway centerline and still be considered a straight-in approach.<br />

8.5.4.5. Additional Information. Look carefully for notes on the IAP. Notes are used<br />

to identify either nonstandard IAP criteria or to emphasize areas essential for the safe<br />

completion of the approach.<br />

8.5.4.6. Visual Descent Point (VDP). The VDP is a defined point on the final<br />

approach course of a non-precision straight-in approach procedure from which a<br />

normal descent (approximately 3°) from the MDA to the runway touchdown point<br />

may be commenced, provided visual reference with the runway environment is<br />

established. The VDP is normally identified by DME and is computed for the nonprecision<br />

approach with the lowest MDA on the IAP. A 75 MHz marker may be used<br />

on those procedures where DME cannot be implemented. VDPs are not a mandatory<br />

part of the procedure, but are intended to provide additional guidance where they are<br />

implemented. A visual approach slope indicator (VASI) lighting system is normally<br />

available at locations where VDPs are established. Where VASI is installed, the VDP<br />

and VASI glide paths are normally coincident. If VASI is not installed, the descent is<br />

computed from the MDA to the runway threshold. On multi-facility approaches, the<br />

depicted VDP will be for the lowest MDA published. Therefore, on an approach with<br />

a higher MDA, the published VDP will not be correct and must be computed by the<br />

pilot. No special technique is required to fly a procedure with a VDP; however, to be<br />

assured of the proper obstacle clearance, the pilot should not descend below the MDA<br />

before reaching the VDP and acquiring the necessary visual reference with the<br />

runway environment. The VDP is identified on the profile view of the approach chart<br />

by the symbol “V” (Figure 8.16).<br />

8.5.4.6.1. In some cases a published VDP may be absent from an IAP due to an<br />

obstacle that penetrates a 20:1 surface. In addition, there was a period of time<br />

where the FAA did not place any emphasis on publishing VDPs on IAPs. As a<br />

result, many IAPs were designed without published VDPs. The problem is that<br />

when a IAP is published without a VDP, there is no way for the pilot to know if it<br />

is due to an obstacle penetration, or because the TERPS specialist just did not<br />

publish it. If performing a non-precision approach to an unfamiliar field at night<br />

(or very low visibility) without a published VDP, and no visual or “normal”<br />

electronic glide path guidance to that runway is available, use caution when<br />

departing the MDA, as there could potentially be an obstacle penetrating the 20:1<br />

surface. See Chapter 15, Visual Glide Slope Indicators (VGSI) for more<br />

information on obstacles in the 20:1 surface.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!