08.01.2015 Views

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFMAN 11-217V1 3 JANUARY 2005 297<br />

Chapter 14<br />

FINAL APPROACH<br />

14.1. Types of Final Approach Guidance. There are numerous different types of final<br />

approach guidance that can be categorized in a number of different ways. For the purposes<br />

of this chapter, final approach guidance will be categorized as follows:<br />

14.1.1. Non-radar Approaches. These are approaches that do not require radar vectoring<br />

or radar services on final approach. Non-radar approaches can be further subdivided<br />

among those that provide electronic glide path guidance and those that do not provide<br />

electronic glide path guidance.<br />

14.1.2. Radar Approaches. These are approaches that require radar vectoring on final<br />

approach. There are two types PAR and ASR.<br />

14.1.3. Procedures with a Visual Component. Sometimes it is not possible to construct<br />

an instrument procedure that meets all requirements. Incorporating a visual component<br />

into an instrument procedure is an acceptable alternative. There are four types of<br />

approaches that fall into this category: visual approach, contact approach, IAP with a<br />

visual segment, and a charted visual flight procedure.<br />

14.1.4. Other Specialized Procedures. These are specialized subsets of particular<br />

approach types listed above. There are four approaches that fall into this category:<br />

converging approaches, ILS/PRM, SOIA, and TLS. All require specialized training and<br />

crew qualifications except converging approaches.<br />

14.2. Non-radar Approaches.<br />

14.2.1. General Procedures.<br />

14.2.1.1. Final Approach.<br />

14.2.1.1.1. Starts. The final approach starts at the FAF and ends at the MAP.<br />

The optimum length of the final approach is 5 miles; the maximum length is 10<br />

miles.<br />

14.2.1.1.2. Navigation receiver. Once the aircraft is inside the final approach<br />

fix, one navigation receiver must remain tuned to and display the facility that<br />

provides final approach course guidance. For example, if an aircraft is equipped<br />

with only one VOR receiver, that receiver cannot be retuned inside the final<br />

approach fix to another VOR station that identifies subsequent stepdown fixes<br />

and/or the missed approach point.<br />

14.2.1.2. Flying the Approach.<br />

14.2.1.2.1. Descent. Avoid rapid descent requirements on final by crossing the<br />

FAF at the published altitude.<br />

14.2.1.2.2. Timing. Timing is required when the final approach does not<br />

terminate at a published fix, as is usually the case with VOR, NDB, and localizer.<br />

If timing is required to identify the missed approach point, begin timing when

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!