08.01.2015 Views

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AFMAN 11-217V1 3 JANUARY 2005 197<br />

Figure 9.4. Who Produced The Procedure<br />

9.5. Instrument Departure Procedures. Except for Diverse Departures, Instrument<br />

Departure Procedures are preplanned IFR procedures that provide obstruction clearance from<br />

the terminal area to the appropriate enroute structure. Normal IFR departure methods are<br />

designed for all engines operating. The following discussion pertains to normal IFR<br />

departures. See paragraph 9.15 for a discussion of engine-out performance considerations.<br />

9.5.1. Methods to Avoid Obstacles. If any obstacles penetrate the 40:1 OCS, then the<br />

TERPS specialist must provide notification to the pilot, as well as establish a method to<br />

avoid the obstacles, or publish the low close-in obstacles. When designing an IFR<br />

departure procedure, methods used by the TERPS specialist are: publish obstacles<br />

location, non-standard takeoff weather minimums, climb gradients, specific routing, or a<br />

combination of several methods. In some cases, IFR departures are not authorized from<br />

specific runways. It is the responsibility of the Pilot In Command (PIC) to thoroughly<br />

review the published instrument departure procedures in order to determine the<br />

appropriate method to be used.<br />

Figure 9.5. IFR Departure Not Authorized.<br />

9.5.1.1. NOTE: Knowing the proper terminology for departures is important. In the<br />

late 1990’s, the FAA started to remove the term Standard Instrument Departure (SID)<br />

from its publications in an attempt to standardize processing and terminology. After<br />

re-evaluating the use of the term SID worldwide, the FAA harmonized with ICAO<br />

and reverted back to using the term SID. The FAA is using the terms SID and<br />

Obstacle Departure Procedure (ODP) in the United States to describe preplanned<br />

published departure routings. The information in the front of the IAP book is titled<br />

“Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) Departure Procedures. This section includes<br />

non-standard weather minimums, low close-in obstacles, ODPs, and climb gradients.<br />

ODPs, are printed either textually or graphically and are referred to as a “Textual<br />

ODP” and “Graphic ODP”; and SIDs are always printed graphically. ODPs are<br />

developed to provide obstruction clearance/avoidance. SIDs also provide obstruction<br />

clearance information but are designed primarily to reduce pilot/controller workload<br />

and to facilitate traffic flow. Thus, a SID may not provide the most optimal route for<br />

obstacle avoidance.<br />

9.5.2. NOTE: Occasionally, a departure procedure will be published specifying a<br />

maximum speed or different routings or restrictions based on aircraft category. On

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!