08.01.2015 Views

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AFMAN 11-217V1 3 JANUARY 2005 341<br />

configurations, or perform any other duties assigned by the pilot. However, the<br />

copilot must understand exactly what those duties and responsibilities are before<br />

the approach.<br />

15.2.4.5.2. Technique One. One technique that has proven quite successful has<br />

been to allow highly qualified copilots to fly the approach, while the pilot makes<br />

the decision to continue or go-around at DH. The pilot assumes control if a<br />

landing is to be made; if not, the copilot executes the go-around. This procedure<br />

puts fewer burdens on the pilot, allowing more time to obtain information from<br />

the visual cues for landing. If the approach is unsatisfactory or insufficient visual<br />

references are available to continue the approach at DH, the copilot, since the<br />

aircraft is on instruments, is prepared to execute a missed approach on command.<br />

If the pilot executes the approach, the copilot may be allowed to control power or<br />

airspeed until DH where the pilot assumes control for the landing or missed<br />

approach.<br />

15.2.4.5.3. Technique Two. Another technique is to have the pilot not flying the<br />

approach continue to monitor flight instruments from DH or minimum descent<br />

altitude to touchdown and notify the pilot flying the approach of excessive<br />

deviations in rates of descent, glide slope, course, or airspeed. This technique will<br />

help detect duck-under maneuvers and will prevent both pilots from being<br />

deceived by a visual illusion that may be present.<br />

15.2.4.5.4. Technique Three. A final technique is to have the autopilot fly the<br />

approach to the DH or MDA and then have the pilot assume control to either land<br />

or execute the go-around as required. This technique can be quite helpful<br />

especially after a long duty day and/or with instrument conditions.<br />

15.3. Approach Lighting Systems.<br />

15.3.1. Types of Approach Lighting Systems.<br />

15.3.1.1. Visual Aids. Approach lighting systems are visual aids used during<br />

instrument conditions to supplement the guidance information of electronic aids such<br />

as VOR, TACAN, PAR, and ILS. The approach lights are designated high intensity<br />

(the basic type of installation) and medium intensity, according to candlepower<br />

output.<br />

15.3.1.2. Adjustment. Most runway and approach light systems allow the tower<br />

controller to adjust the lamp brightness for different visibility conditions, or at a<br />

pilot's request. The extreme brilliance of high intensity lights penetrates fog, smoke,<br />

precipitation, etc., but may cause excessive glare under some conditions.<br />

15.3.1.3. Depiction. The approach lighting systems now in use, along with their<br />

standard lengths, appear in the FIH. Each IAP chart indicates the type of approach<br />

lighting system by a circled letter on the airport sketch. Actual length is shown on the<br />

airport diagram for any system, or portion thereof, which is not of standard length.<br />

The IFR Supplement indicates availability of airfield, runway, approach, sequenced<br />

flashing, runway end identification lights, runway centerline lights, and VGSI.<br />

15.3.1.4. Pilot Activation. Some airports have installed airport lighting systems that<br />

can be activated by the pilot "keying the microphone" on selected frequencies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!