TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 105<br />
(5) Other Forms of Discrimination<br />
Violations of section 8(a) (3) were also found m hme employ ei s<br />
enteied into ot maintained collective-blugaimng agreements which<br />
accoided union membeis pieferential Ns ages ot othet benefits 50 And<br />
a Boat d majority found the section violated on the basis of "the<br />
attendant cncumstances," lather than on a per se themy, NN hei e a<br />
seasonal employer, after a lawful economic stuke, adopted a nem<br />
hning formula for the following season uhich failed to maid sti ikeis<br />
for the time they had engaged in the stlike, and theieby diminished<br />
their employment opportunities °°<br />
Dining the past yeat the Boat d also found that an employe' iolated<br />
the section by dischatging an employee from a job as a tesult<br />
of union pressuie because of the employee's "failure to pei fotm obligations<br />
imposed by the Respondent Umon on its membets and 1% m k<br />
pet mit holders " 01 The "plessules" weie bi ought hem by the union<br />
steward because the employee took exception to the stewat d's lanai ks<br />
during a lecture to the employees on quitting and stat tmg times, which<br />
lectme was delivered by the stewaid at the du ection of the union's<br />
business agent<br />
d Special Remedial Problems<br />
Since the Supreme Court's decision in Local 60, Carpenters," on<br />
April 17, 1961, holding that a refund of dues and fees was beyond<br />
the <strong>Board</strong>'s remedial authority "[w]heie no membership in the union<br />
was shown to be influenced or compelled by leason of any unian<br />
labor practice," the Boaid ditected teimbursement iemedies in only<br />
two cases during the fiscal year 03 In one case,'" a panel majority held<br />
that a reimbursement order was pi oper under the Sum eme Court's<br />
decision whet e the employer and the union illegally exacted stiike<br />
assessments from employees as a condition of continued employment<br />
so See, o g Indiana Gas EC Chemical Corp, 1-10 NLRB 1488 (health insurance and put<br />
,on benefits limited to union members) , American Advertising Matt Onion', 129 NLRB<br />
640, 634 (union employees paid 21/2 cents pet hour more than nonunion employ cm.)<br />
92 Community Shops, Inc, 130 NLRB 1522, Member Rodgers dissenting<br />
fil Brunswick-Bathe Cailcndcr Co , 131 NLRB No 30, and the proposed supplemcntal dem<br />
sten and order issued in this cam after thc close of the fiscal omir, 133 NLRB No 59<br />
92 Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters v NLRB, 365 U S 651 Bee Supreme<br />
Com t Rulings helm% p 136 lot a full diRcussion of this decision<br />
For prior cases during the fiscal yesr in which reimbursement as directed see<br />
Wershey Chocolate Corp • 129 NLRB 1052 (common to pay dues) , Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.<br />
129 N1,1.13 1166 (1)1 , 1 ci rut VI/ qua sa LI( Is re ef /' it,"I V 1 I it 119 0 S 5". r ttlier<br />
than Brown-Olde, 115 NLRB 594) , Cadillac Wore Corp, 128 NLRB 1002 (new employee<br />
required to join union within 80 days) , Lykes Bros Inc of Georgia, 128 NLRB 600 (re<br />
fund only to those employees who sere individually coerced into signing dues checkoff<br />
cards) See also ()ache, witz iS Sons, 130 NLRB 1078, Booth iS Flinn Ca, 129 NLRB<br />
667, and Hooke; Chemical Coi p , 128 NLRB 1394, where reimbuisement was deemed<br />
uns arranted<br />
94 Plot once Brooks, 131 NLRB No 97, Member Leedom dissenting in part