07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 105<br />

(5) Other Forms of Discrimination<br />

Violations of section 8(a) (3) were also found m hme employ ei s<br />

enteied into ot maintained collective-blugaimng agreements which<br />

accoided union membeis pieferential Ns ages ot othet benefits 50 And<br />

a Boat d majority found the section violated on the basis of "the<br />

attendant cncumstances," lather than on a per se themy, NN hei e a<br />

seasonal employer, after a lawful economic stuke, adopted a nem<br />

hning formula for the following season uhich failed to maid sti ikeis<br />

for the time they had engaged in the stlike, and theieby diminished<br />

their employment opportunities °°<br />

Dining the past yeat the Boat d also found that an employe' iolated<br />

the section by dischatging an employee from a job as a tesult<br />

of union pressuie because of the employee's "failure to pei fotm obligations<br />

imposed by the Respondent Umon on its membets and 1% m k<br />

pet mit holders " 01 The "plessules" weie bi ought hem by the union<br />

steward because the employee took exception to the stewat d's lanai ks<br />

during a lecture to the employees on quitting and stat tmg times, which<br />

lectme was delivered by the stewaid at the du ection of the union's<br />

business agent<br />

d Special Remedial Problems<br />

Since the Supreme Court's decision in Local 60, Carpenters," on<br />

April 17, 1961, holding that a refund of dues and fees was beyond<br />

the <strong>Board</strong>'s remedial authority "[w]heie no membership in the union<br />

was shown to be influenced or compelled by leason of any unian<br />

labor practice," the Boaid ditected teimbursement iemedies in only<br />

two cases during the fiscal year 03 In one case,'" a panel majority held<br />

that a reimbursement order was pi oper under the Sum eme Court's<br />

decision whet e the employer and the union illegally exacted stiike<br />

assessments from employees as a condition of continued employment<br />

so See, o g Indiana Gas EC Chemical Corp, 1-10 NLRB 1488 (health insurance and put<br />

,on benefits limited to union members) , American Advertising Matt Onion', 129 NLRB<br />

640, 634 (union employees paid 21/2 cents pet hour more than nonunion employ cm.)<br />

92 Community Shops, Inc, 130 NLRB 1522, Member Rodgers dissenting<br />

fil Brunswick-Bathe Cailcndcr Co , 131 NLRB No 30, and the proposed supplemcntal dem<br />

sten and order issued in this cam after thc close of the fiscal omir, 133 NLRB No 59<br />

92 Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters v NLRB, 365 U S 651 Bee Supreme<br />

Com t Rulings helm% p 136 lot a full diRcussion of this decision<br />

For prior cases during the fiscal yesr in which reimbursement as directed see<br />

Wershey Chocolate Corp • 129 NLRB 1052 (common to pay dues) , Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.<br />

129 N1,1.13 1166 (1)1 , 1 ci rut VI/ qua sa LI( Is re ef /' it,"I V 1 I it 119 0 S 5". r ttlier<br />

than Brown-Olde, 115 NLRB 594) , Cadillac Wore Corp, 128 NLRB 1002 (new employee<br />

required to join union within 80 days) , Lykes Bros Inc of Georgia, 128 NLRB 600 (re<br />

fund only to those employees who sere individually coerced into signing dues checkoff<br />

cards) See also ()ache, witz iS Sons, 130 NLRB 1078, Booth iS Flinn Ca, 129 NLRB<br />

667, and Hooke; Chemical Coi p , 128 NLRB 1394, where reimbuisement was deemed<br />

uns arranted<br />

94 Plot once Brooks, 131 NLRB No 97, Member Leedom dissenting in part

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!