TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
-teria),<br />
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 125<br />
of the Supreme Court's Radw Officers decision,21 the <strong>Board</strong> was of<br />
the opinion that since the withdrawal cards could be issued only to<br />
members in good standing, i e, employees who had paid fines and<br />
assessments as well as periodic dues and initiation fees, the foreseeable<br />
consequence of the seniority provision was encouragement of union<br />
membership<br />
(2) Illegal Union-Security Agreements and Practices<br />
The act's limitations on the right of labor organizations and employe/<br />
s to make and enforce agreements conditioning employment on<br />
union membership are—as stated earlier in this report 22—contamed<br />
in the so-called union-security proviso to section 8(a) (3), as supplemented<br />
by section 8(f) relating to the buildmg and construction<br />
industry<br />
Union-security agreements which fail to conform to any one of<br />
the statutory requirements have been held to subrct the affected employees<br />
to unlawful discrimination A union whicji seeks to compel<br />
an employer to enter into such an agreement, 23 or executes or maintains<br />
such an agreement, thereby violates section 8(b) (2) which prohibits<br />
unions from attempting to cause, as well as causing, unlawful<br />
discrimination 24 Cases where violations of this type were found dui -<br />
ing fiscal 1961 involved maintenance of union-security agreements<br />
which were unlawful because the contracting union did not have<br />
marrity status among the employee,25 or, having received unlawful<br />
employer assistance, was not their bona fide representative, 26 as well<br />
as agreements which exceeded the statutory limitations."<br />
Section 8(b) (2) violations were also found where the respondent<br />
union enforced valid union-security clauses in a manner not permitted<br />
by the act Thus, the <strong>Board</strong> held in one case 28 that a union violated<br />
the act by demanding the discharge of an employee under the terms<br />
of its union-security contract, even though the union had accepted the<br />
employee's tender of delinquent initiation fees and dues and had<br />
notified him of his reinstatement<br />
Another union's request to the employei to discharge an employee<br />
for alleged dues delinquency was held to be violative of the act since<br />
o 347 U S 17 (1054)<br />
See p 99, above<br />
23 Bee Local Joint Executive <strong>Board</strong> of Hotel 4 Restaurant Employees etc (Groton Cafe<br />
130 NLRB 1551, discussed above, pp 117 and 123<br />
24 industrial Rayon Corp • 130 NLRB 427<br />
el Checker Taxi Go, Inc , 131 NLRB No 90<br />
23 American Advertising Distributors, 129 NLRB 640<br />
Checker Taxi Co, above See also p 100 above<br />
22 F J Burns Droving, lac, 129 NLRB 252 See also International Union of Electrical,<br />
Radio 4 Hoc/sine Workers Frigidaire Local 801 (General Motors Corp ) 129 NLRB 1379