TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Jurischaton of the <strong>Board</strong> 29<br />
of its clelical employees, as an integral part of its international and on<br />
the basis of the inteinational's annual inflow in excess of $100,000<br />
fican its affiliated locals in vanous States 45 And in several other<br />
cases, it dealt with the application of the indnect outflow standard,<br />
the application of standards to newly formed enteiprises, and the<br />
selection of the applicable standard for an integt ated nom etail-letail<br />
ente" prise<br />
a. Indirect Outflow Standard<br />
Under the nonretail standard, the <strong>Board</strong> will assert juusdiction<br />
ovei enteiplises which have $50,000 annual outflow ol inflow, dnect<br />
01 inch' ect 47 India ect outflow includes sales within the State to<br />
use's meeting any standard, except solely an indirect inflow or indirect<br />
outflow standard<br />
In one case," the Boind declaied that in proceeding under this<br />
standa" d it is unnecessary to inqune into the natule of the goods oi<br />
services finnished by the employe' to its customeDs and as to 'IA hethet<br />
they aie utilized directly or indirectly in the goods or materials<br />
mossing State lines The standard ""equiles that the employer's<br />
oduct merely be used in the ope" ations of the interstate enterprise<br />
" 49 Accoidingly, it held in asserting jurisdiction in that case<br />
that it was immaterial whether or not dolomite limestone—mined,<br />
sold, and spread by the employer as a soil conditioner in the State of<br />
Floncla—became an ingredient in flints and pi oduce shipped outside<br />
the State 5° In another case,51 a panel maJority 52 asserted jurisdiction<br />
over a respondent on the basis of its indirect outflow, and held<br />
that a credit arrangement of one of respondent's customers for the<br />
billing of purchases through another company within the State, to<br />
satisfy the credit requirements of the customer's out-of-State supplier,<br />
did not make the interstate shipments to the customer "indirect"<br />
"See Oregon Teamsters' Sem Ity Plan Office, dc, 119 NLRB 207 (1957) , Twenty-third<br />
Annual Report (1958), pp 10 and 12<br />
47 See Siemens Mailing Sc, vice, 122 NLRB Si (1958) , and Twenty-third Annual Report.<br />
PS<br />
Southern Dolomite, 129 NLRB 1342<br />
"See also Whippany Motor Go, Inc , 115 NLRB 52 (1956), decided prior to the cm rent<br />
standards<br />
"The <strong>Board</strong> attached no significance to the fact that the emploi er's customer .; were<br />
engaged in commerce by virtue of their interstate shipment of fruits and produce While<br />
sec 2(3) excepts from the term "employee" any individual emplo yed as an agricultural<br />
laborer, sec 2(6) does not except trade or tr tfilc in agricultural products from its definition<br />
of "commerce"<br />
Trettenero Sand d Gravel Go, 129 NLRB 610<br />
52 Member Rodgers dissenting