07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jurischaton of the <strong>Board</strong> 29<br />

of its clelical employees, as an integral part of its international and on<br />

the basis of the inteinational's annual inflow in excess of $100,000<br />

fican its affiliated locals in vanous States 45 And in several other<br />

cases, it dealt with the application of the indnect outflow standard,<br />

the application of standards to newly formed enteiprises, and the<br />

selection of the applicable standard for an integt ated nom etail-letail<br />

ente" prise<br />

a. Indirect Outflow Standard<br />

Under the nonretail standard, the <strong>Board</strong> will assert juusdiction<br />

ovei enteiplises which have $50,000 annual outflow ol inflow, dnect<br />

01 inch' ect 47 India ect outflow includes sales within the State to<br />

use's meeting any standard, except solely an indirect inflow or indirect<br />

outflow standard<br />

In one case," the Boind declaied that in proceeding under this<br />

standa" d it is unnecessary to inqune into the natule of the goods oi<br />

services finnished by the employe' to its customeDs and as to 'IA hethet<br />

they aie utilized directly or indirectly in the goods or materials<br />

mossing State lines The standard ""equiles that the employer's<br />

oduct merely be used in the ope" ations of the interstate enterprise<br />

" 49 Accoidingly, it held in asserting jurisdiction in that case<br />

that it was immaterial whether or not dolomite limestone—mined,<br />

sold, and spread by the employer as a soil conditioner in the State of<br />

Floncla—became an ingredient in flints and pi oduce shipped outside<br />

the State 5° In another case,51 a panel maJority 52 asserted jurisdiction<br />

over a respondent on the basis of its indirect outflow, and held<br />

that a credit arrangement of one of respondent's customers for the<br />

billing of purchases through another company within the State, to<br />

satisfy the credit requirements of the customer's out-of-State supplier,<br />

did not make the interstate shipments to the customer "indirect"<br />

"See Oregon Teamsters' Sem Ity Plan Office, dc, 119 NLRB 207 (1957) , Twenty-third<br />

Annual Report (1958), pp 10 and 12<br />

47 See Siemens Mailing Sc, vice, 122 NLRB Si (1958) , and Twenty-third Annual Report.<br />

PS<br />

Southern Dolomite, 129 NLRB 1342<br />

"See also Whippany Motor Go, Inc , 115 NLRB 52 (1956), decided prior to the cm rent<br />

standards<br />

"The <strong>Board</strong> attached no significance to the fact that the emploi er's customer .; were<br />

engaged in commerce by virtue of their interstate shipment of fruits and produce While<br />

sec 2(3) excepts from the term "employee" any individual emplo yed as an agricultural<br />

laborer, sec 2(6) does not except trade or tr tfilc in agricultural products from its definition<br />

of "commerce"<br />

Trettenero Sand d Gravel Go, 129 NLRB 610<br />

52 Member Rodgers dissenting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!