07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

made to coincide with the time when a representative number of the<br />

contemplated enlaiged work force is employed 67<br />

The Boaid declined to dismiss a petition which sought a unit of<br />

employees at a construction company's fabrication yard although<br />

no substantial and iepresentative employee complement was presently<br />

employed at the yard because of the completion of contracts aftei<br />

the filing of the petition 68 However, in view of the expected increase<br />

in yard peisonnel as new contemplated contracts are obtained, the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> tieated the yard operations here as analogous to seasonal operations<br />

and dilectecl the regional directoi to conduct an election "in<br />

the foreseeable future when, in the opinion of the regional director, a<br />

substantial and representative complement is employed" at the employer's<br />

yard<br />

c Standards of Election Conduct<br />

<strong>Board</strong> elections are conducted m accordance with strict standards<br />

designed to assure that the participating employees have an oppoitunity<br />

to register a free and untrammeled choice in selecting a bargaining<br />

representative Any party to an election who believes that<br />

the standards were not met may, within 5 days, file objections to the<br />

election with the regional director under whose supervision it was<br />

held The regional &lector then may either make a report on the<br />

objections, or may issue a decision disposing of the issues raised by<br />

the objections which is subject to a limited review by the <strong>Board</strong> 7"<br />

Tn the GI ea the iegional director issues a report, any party may file<br />

exceptions to this iepoit with the <strong>Board</strong> The issues reused by the<br />

objections, and exceptions if any, are then finally determined by the<br />

<strong>Board</strong><br />

(1) Mechanics of Election<br />

Election details, such as the time, place, and notice of an election,<br />

are left largely to the regional director 72 The <strong>Board</strong> does not inter-<br />

J R Simplot Co, 130 NLRB 272 See also <strong>National</strong> Gypsum Co, 128 NLRB 315.<br />

Boum Chemical Co 129 NLRB 929, and Ifolker Chemical Corp, 130 NLRB 1'394, n here<br />

unit expansion was held not to justify post ponement because it vris shown thlt a substantial<br />

and representative segment of the employee complement would be employed at Um<br />

normal election date<br />

W Horace Williams Co, 130 NLRB 223<br />

so See also Ernest Renda Contracting Co, 130 NLRB 1515, where the <strong>Board</strong> postponed<br />

the election because construction work on a sanitary sewer project may be intermittent on<br />

gccount of adverse climatic conditions.<br />

70 This procedure applies only to directed elections, not consent or stipulated elections<br />

For the latter procedures, see <strong>Board</strong>'s Rules and Regulations. Series 8, secs 102 62 and<br />

102 69(c)<br />

71 The procedures for filing objections and exceptions and for their disposition are set<br />

out in sec 102 69 of the <strong>Board</strong>'s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, effective<br />

with respect to any petition filed under sec 9 (c) or (e) of the act on or after May 15, 1961<br />

Under the old bec 102 09, in force during the greater part of fiscal 1961, the procedures<br />

provided that If any party to an election should timely file objections, the regional director<br />

could then only make a report on the objections<br />

*2 See, e g, Jat Transportation Corp, 131 NLRB No 39, Member Fanning dissenting in<br />

other respects, where the <strong>Board</strong> rejected the contention that the free choice of the em-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!