TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
120 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
The numerous interrelated 8(b) (1) (A)-8(b) (2) cases decided<br />
during fiscal 1961 00 again involved union-security agreements which<br />
did not conform to statutory limitations," unlawful hiring arrangements,"<br />
and agreements giving preference to union members in terms<br />
of employment 03<br />
Other cases in this category were concerned with coercion resulting<br />
from unlawful union requests for the discharge of, or refusal of employment<br />
to, individuals for nonmembership or nonobservance of<br />
union rules"<br />
2. Restraint and Coercion of Employers<br />
Section 8(b) (1) (B) makes it an unfair labor practice for a labor<br />
organization or its agents to restrain or coerce an employer in the<br />
selection of his representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining<br />
or the adjustment of grievances<br />
Only one case involving section 8(b) (1) (B) was decided by the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> in the past year." Here, the respondent unions met for about 5<br />
months with an employer association representing a number of companies<br />
but having authority to make "recommendations only" After<br />
an impasse had been reached, the unions submitted contract proposals<br />
directly to an individual company with the ultimatum that if the employer<br />
did not sign, a strike would ensue The unions refused the<br />
employer's request for time in order to consult with the employer<br />
association, and a strike was called immediately It was conceded<br />
that the employees of this individual company constituted a separate<br />
appropriate unit The <strong>Board</strong> majority found that the strike was not<br />
called because of objections to dealing u ith the agent as the employer's<br />
representative, but rather because of disagreement over terms<br />
00 These cases are more fully discussed in the chapter dealing spedlically with 8(b) (2)<br />
violation6, below, pp 121-127<br />
v, See e g NA Taxi Co 131 NLRB No 96<br />
" See, e g, Southeastern Plate Glass Co • 129 NLRB 412 • Union Taxi Corp, 130 NLRB<br />
814 Satchwell Electric Construction On, MG, 128 NLRB 1265, 1267<br />
03 See e g • Indiana Gaa ct Chemical Col p • 130 NLRB 1488 (health insurance and pension<br />
benefits limited to union members) , American Advertising Distributors, 129 NLRB 640,<br />
654 (union employees paid 2% cents per hour more tkan nonunion employees)<br />
"See, e g, BrunsuncL-Balke-Collender Co, 131 NLRB No 30 (taking exception to<br />
union steward's remarks concerning starting and quitting of work) • International Union,<br />
UAW, AFL—CIO, etc (John I Paulding, Inc ), 180 NLRB 1085 (failure to follow union<br />
plocedures for resignation of members prior to execution of maintenance of membership<br />
contract) , Miami Valley Carpenters District Council of Dayton Ohio (B G Dania Co ),<br />
129 NLRB 517 (nonpayment of fine) , Subordinate Lodge No 169, International Brotherhood<br />
of Boilermakers, eta (A B Anderson Construction Co), 129 NLRB 1008 (failure<br />
to compl y with union's requirement that members seeking employment use its hiring hall)<br />
KU!, AFL-010, Frigidaire Local 801 (General Motors Corp ), 129 NLRB 1379 (failure<br />
to observe mechanics of reinstatement)<br />
05 Lumber if Sawmill Workers, Local 2647 (Cheney California Lumber Co ), 130 NLRB<br />
285, Member Rodgers dissenting The <strong>Board</strong> also dismissed the allegation that the strike<br />
violatid sec 8(b) (3) See below, p 127