TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Representation Cases 61<br />
(1) Agricultural <strong>Labor</strong>ers<br />
A continuing rider to the Boat d's appropnation act requires the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> to determine "agricultui al laborei" status so as to conform to<br />
the definition of the teim "agricultule" in section 3(f) of the Fair<br />
<strong>Labor</strong> Standards Act<br />
In applying the statutory terms, it is the <strong>Board</strong>'s policy "to follow<br />
vvhenever possible" the interpretation of section 3(f) by the Dept"' t-<br />
ment of <strong>Labor</strong> 12 Thus, employees engaged in the raising, butcheiing,<br />
packing, freezing, and distribution of rainbow trout were held not<br />
agricultural laboreis but "employees" in view of the ruling of the Department<br />
of <strong>Labor</strong> that employees engaged in "fish fanning" of the<br />
type involved here are not employed in aglicultule within the meaning<br />
of section 3(f) ld<br />
Employees at a dairy farming and milk pi ocessing operation who<br />
are regularly employed full time in pi oce,ssing, bottling, and delivering<br />
milk and other dairy products were held not ag," 'cultural laborers 14<br />
On the other hand, individuals who tend cattle', raise poultry, and<br />
handle milk and eggs on a dairy and poultiy faim w eie held agticultural<br />
laboiers under section 2(3) 25<br />
(2) Independent Contractors<br />
In determining whether an individual is an independent conti actor<br />
rather than an employee, and therefoie must be excluded flout a pi o<br />
posed bargaining unit, the <strong>Board</strong> has consistently applied the "i ightof-control"<br />
test 26 This test is based on whether the pet son foi w ham<br />
the individual pei forms services has retained contiol not only over<br />
the result to be achieved but also over the manner in which the work<br />
19 to be performed The resolution of this question depends on the<br />
facts of each case, and no one factor is determinative 17<br />
In one case the Boat d held that newpaper distributois were employces<br />
rather than independent contractols because the employe' "eseived<br />
the right to control, when and as it saw fit, the manne" and means, as<br />
well as the result, of the distributors' work 15 Hele, the fact that<br />
social security and withholding taxes were not deducted and that the<br />
distributors owned their own bucks and lined helpers if needed, was<br />
"Snake River Trout Co • 129 NLRB 41 See also Twent3 fifth Annual Report, p 43<br />
23 Snake River Trout Co, abo%e<br />
Shoenberg Farms, 129 NLRB 966 citing II A Bider tt Sons, 117 NLRB 517 (1957)<br />
15 Pine State Creamery Co , 130 NLRB 892<br />
" The test applies equally in determining %%both( r the [rut ticular Indlidua1s ina3 prop<br />
erly be included in a bargaining unit under sec 9 of the act, and where their employee<br />
status for the purposes of the unfair laboi make p1 ON Ni011$ of CPC 8 is in Bane<br />
'I Buffalo Courser Express, Ino , 129 NLRB 932., Lindsay Ncu,spapera, lac, 130 NLRB<br />
680, Mohican TrucLIng Co. 131 NLRB No 148<br />
13 Buffalo Courier Express, Inc , above, distinguishing P 0 Publishing Co, 114 NLRB GO<br />
(1955)