TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
that the voters are ineligible, and have failed to object to the agent's<br />
announcement that the ballots would be destroyed 79<br />
(2) Interference With Election<br />
An election will be set aside if it was accompanied by conduct<br />
which, in the <strong>Board</strong>'s view, created an atmosphete of confusion or fear<br />
of reprisals and thus interfered with the employees' free and untrammeled<br />
choice of a representative guaranteed by the act 8° In determining<br />
whether specific conduct amounted to such interference, the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> does not attempt to assess its actual effect on the employees but<br />
concerns itself with whether it is reasonable to conclude that the conduct<br />
tended to prevent a free expression of the employees' choice<br />
An election will be set aside because of pi ejudicial conduct whethei<br />
or not the conduct is attributable to one of the parties The determinative<br />
factor is that conduct has °cell' red which cleated a geneial<br />
atmosphere in which a free choice of a bargaining repiesentative was<br />
impossible al<br />
(a) Preelection speeches—the 24-hour rule<br />
In order to insure an atmospheie conducive to a flee election, the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> has prohibited participating parties from making preelection<br />
speeches on company time and propel ty to massed assemblies of emrloyees<br />
within 24 hours before the time scheduled for an election<br />
Violation of this rule, known as the Peerless rule,82 results m the election<br />
being set aside<br />
In one case, a Christmas party held in one of the employer's<br />
lestaurants on the day before the election was deemed not violative of<br />
the Peerless rule 84, The date of the party had been selected before<br />
the preelection conference established the date for the election, the<br />
employees attended voluntarily and on their own time, and the only<br />
supervisor in attendance, who was the supervisor for that particulai<br />
restaurant, made no speech nor led any discussion concerning the election<br />
or the union In reaching its decision in this case, the <strong>Board</strong><br />
also considered again the effect of the employer's speeches to employees<br />
during the time mail balloting was in progress 84 It held that the<br />
" Interstate Hoak', lac, 131 NLRB No 153<br />
In order to prevent confusion and turmoil at the time of the election, the <strong>Board</strong> has<br />
specificslly prohibited electioneering speeches on company time during the 24 hour period<br />
just before the election, Pew lose Plywood Co, 107 NLRB 427 (195.3), as well as<br />
electioneering near the polling place during the election<br />
81 See James Lew; and Sons Co, 130 NLRB 290, former Chairman Leedom and Member<br />
Rodgers dissenting, where a majority of the <strong>Board</strong> set aside an election because the statements<br />
and conduct by responsible groups and indiiduals in the community reasonably<br />
conveyed the view to the employees that in the event of unionisation the employer could<br />
shut down its plant and other employers would not locate in the community<br />
= Peerless Plymood Co, above, footnote 80<br />
as Interstate Hosts, lac, above<br />
8' See Oregon Washington Telephone Co, 123 NLRB 339 (1959)