07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

that the voters are ineligible, and have failed to object to the agent's<br />

announcement that the ballots would be destroyed 79<br />

(2) Interference With Election<br />

An election will be set aside if it was accompanied by conduct<br />

which, in the <strong>Board</strong>'s view, created an atmosphete of confusion or fear<br />

of reprisals and thus interfered with the employees' free and untrammeled<br />

choice of a representative guaranteed by the act 8° In determining<br />

whether specific conduct amounted to such interference, the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> does not attempt to assess its actual effect on the employees but<br />

concerns itself with whether it is reasonable to conclude that the conduct<br />

tended to prevent a free expression of the employees' choice<br />

An election will be set aside because of pi ejudicial conduct whethei<br />

or not the conduct is attributable to one of the parties The determinative<br />

factor is that conduct has °cell' red which cleated a geneial<br />

atmosphere in which a free choice of a bargaining repiesentative was<br />

impossible al<br />

(a) Preelection speeches—the 24-hour rule<br />

In order to insure an atmospheie conducive to a flee election, the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> has prohibited participating parties from making preelection<br />

speeches on company time and propel ty to massed assemblies of emrloyees<br />

within 24 hours before the time scheduled for an election<br />

Violation of this rule, known as the Peerless rule,82 results m the election<br />

being set aside<br />

In one case, a Christmas party held in one of the employer's<br />

lestaurants on the day before the election was deemed not violative of<br />

the Peerless rule 84, The date of the party had been selected before<br />

the preelection conference established the date for the election, the<br />

employees attended voluntarily and on their own time, and the only<br />

supervisor in attendance, who was the supervisor for that particulai<br />

restaurant, made no speech nor led any discussion concerning the election<br />

or the union In reaching its decision in this case, the <strong>Board</strong><br />

also considered again the effect of the employer's speeches to employees<br />

during the time mail balloting was in progress 84 It held that the<br />

" Interstate Hoak', lac, 131 NLRB No 153<br />

In order to prevent confusion and turmoil at the time of the election, the <strong>Board</strong> has<br />

specificslly prohibited electioneering speeches on company time during the 24 hour period<br />

just before the election, Pew lose Plywood Co, 107 NLRB 427 (195.3), as well as<br />

electioneering near the polling place during the election<br />

81 See James Lew; and Sons Co, 130 NLRB 290, former Chairman Leedom and Member<br />

Rodgers dissenting, where a majority of the <strong>Board</strong> set aside an election because the statements<br />

and conduct by responsible groups and indiiduals in the community reasonably<br />

conveyed the view to the employees that in the event of unionisation the employer could<br />

shut down its plant and other employers would not locate in the community<br />

= Peerless Plymood Co, above, footnote 80<br />

as Interstate Hosts, lac, above<br />

8' See Oregon Washington Telephone Co, 123 NLRB 339 (1959)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!