TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Jurisdiction of the <strong>Board</strong> 25<br />
case Both concerned the operation of Caribbean cruise ships under<br />
foreign registry with clews composed pi 'manly of nonresident aliens<br />
These vessels °pet ated regularly between Miami, Florida, where the<br />
passengers weie taken aboard and retuined, and various foreign ports,<br />
but never in the waters of the countaies of their iegistry In one<br />
case," a ship under Liberian registry was owned by a Libman corpoiation,<br />
chartered baieboat to anothet Liberian corporation, and operated<br />
under time subchartei by an American col poi ation which had<br />
oiganized, and still owned, both Libman corporations The <strong>Board</strong>,<br />
one Member dissenting," found the situation substantially the same<br />
as that in West India, above, and asserted jurisdiction It noted that<br />
the -.4melican corporation had full cont. ol of the vessel, was its<br />
beneficial owner and the employer of the crew, and that "the foreign<br />
incorporation of the nominal ownet and opeiator of a vessel [could<br />
not] bar the jurisdiction of the Act over an operation otherwise<br />
within the coverage of its provisions"<br />
In the other case," a ship of Panamanian iegiktiy was owned and<br />
°pet ated by a Panamanian col potation, which had conti acted to have<br />
an Ametican cot poration act as its exclusive agent in the United<br />
States to handle matters concerning passengers and cal go, the sale of<br />
passenger tickets and sales promotion, i epairs and piovisiomng of<br />
the ship, and related matters The Panamanian owner-operator<br />
tetamed direct control over hit ing and othei dealings with shipboard<br />
pet sonnel, and determined what voyages to make But the business<br />
of the vessel was handled mainly out of the office of the American<br />
cot potation in Miami, Florida, where the vessel was pi imatily berthed<br />
and her voyages begun and terminated The vessel's gloss annual<br />
earnings were about $700,000, some 95 percent of its ptthsengers and<br />
about 85 percent of its cargo originating in the United States<br />
Futther, about 95 percent of its annual expenditures of about $200,000<br />
weie made in the United States The <strong>Board</strong> majority 18 found that<br />
both corporations were engaged in a single mtegtated enterprise<br />
which was essentially a domestic operation having a continuing and<br />
substantial impact on the domestic and foteign commeice of the<br />
United States, and asserted juiisdiction Although, unlike the West<br />
India situation, the shipownei and employer of the crew was a<br />
foreign corporation, the majotity neve' theless found that this maiitime<br />
operation possessed "those substantial United States contacts"<br />
winch, under the West India decision, bi ought it within the act's<br />
jurisdiction and noted, "It is not necessaiy that all the signifi-<br />
'5 Peninsular et Occidental SteamshIp Co, 132 NLRB No 1 (July 10, 1961)<br />
le Member Rodgers<br />
11 Ras ft; n num.:nil Corp. 112 NLRB No 72 (August 10, 1961)<br />
'5 Member Rodgers dissenting