07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jurisdiction of the <strong>Board</strong> 25<br />

case Both concerned the operation of Caribbean cruise ships under<br />

foreign registry with clews composed pi 'manly of nonresident aliens<br />

These vessels °pet ated regularly between Miami, Florida, where the<br />

passengers weie taken aboard and retuined, and various foreign ports,<br />

but never in the waters of the countaies of their iegistry In one<br />

case," a ship under Liberian registry was owned by a Libman corpoiation,<br />

chartered baieboat to anothet Liberian corporation, and operated<br />

under time subchartei by an American col poi ation which had<br />

oiganized, and still owned, both Libman corporations The <strong>Board</strong>,<br />

one Member dissenting," found the situation substantially the same<br />

as that in West India, above, and asserted jurisdiction It noted that<br />

the -.4melican corporation had full cont. ol of the vessel, was its<br />

beneficial owner and the employer of the crew, and that "the foreign<br />

incorporation of the nominal ownet and opeiator of a vessel [could<br />

not] bar the jurisdiction of the Act over an operation otherwise<br />

within the coverage of its provisions"<br />

In the other case," a ship of Panamanian iegiktiy was owned and<br />

°pet ated by a Panamanian col potation, which had conti acted to have<br />

an Ametican cot poration act as its exclusive agent in the United<br />

States to handle matters concerning passengers and cal go, the sale of<br />

passenger tickets and sales promotion, i epairs and piovisiomng of<br />

the ship, and related matters The Panamanian owner-operator<br />

tetamed direct control over hit ing and othei dealings with shipboard<br />

pet sonnel, and determined what voyages to make But the business<br />

of the vessel was handled mainly out of the office of the American<br />

cot potation in Miami, Florida, where the vessel was pi imatily berthed<br />

and her voyages begun and terminated The vessel's gloss annual<br />

earnings were about $700,000, some 95 percent of its ptthsengers and<br />

about 85 percent of its cargo originating in the United States<br />

Futther, about 95 percent of its annual expenditures of about $200,000<br />

weie made in the United States The <strong>Board</strong> majority 18 found that<br />

both corporations were engaged in a single mtegtated enterprise<br />

which was essentially a domestic operation having a continuing and<br />

substantial impact on the domestic and foteign commeice of the<br />

United States, and asserted juiisdiction Although, unlike the West<br />

India situation, the shipownei and employer of the crew was a<br />

foreign corporation, the majotity neve' theless found that this maiitime<br />

operation possessed "those substantial United States contacts"<br />

winch, under the West India decision, bi ought it within the act's<br />

jurisdiction and noted, "It is not necessaiy that all the signifi-<br />

'5 Peninsular et Occidental SteamshIp Co, 132 NLRB No 1 (July 10, 1961)<br />

le Member Rodgers<br />

11 Ras ft; n num.:nil Corp. 112 NLRB No 72 (August 10, 1961)<br />

'5 Member Rodgers dissenting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!