TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 123<br />
by the union for his discharge In this case, the union steward<br />
warned the employer that it would not be safe for union members to<br />
work with this nonunion employee on union jobs as they might be subject<br />
to union fine In the majority's opinion, this warning clearly<br />
implied that the union men might refuse to work if this nonunion employee<br />
was used on union jobs<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> also had occasion to reiterate that peaceful picketing for<br />
a union-security clause at a tune when the union did not represent<br />
a majority of employees in an appropriate unit constitutes an unlawful<br />
"attempt to cause" discrimination within section 8(b) (2).6<br />
And a work stoppage to induce an employer to discharge union employees<br />
who had exercised their lawful right to apply directly to<br />
the employer for jobs—rather than through the union's hiring hall—<br />
was likewise held to be an unlawful "attempt to cause" discrimmation,7<br />
as was a union's threats of economic pressures if a nonunion employee<br />
was not discharged 8<br />
In Spzegelberg Lumber & Building Co ,9 a Boatd majority held<br />
that, under the particular circumstances, a union unlawfully caused<br />
the discharge of an employee for accepting the employer's offer of<br />
substantially better working conditions than were contained in the<br />
union's contract with the employer. The union's action, according<br />
to the majority, foreseeably tended to encourage membership in and<br />
fealty to the union It pointed out, however, that its holding here<br />
did not mean that a union is powerless to protect its bargaining position<br />
when confronted with dissident employees seeking different<br />
working conditions outside of collective bargaining, but, rather, that<br />
the union cannot protect that position by causing dissident workers<br />
to be discharged for that reason<br />
(1) Illegal Employment Agreements and Practices<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> has consistently held that a union violates section 8<br />
(b) (2) by entering into or maintaining an agreement which requires<br />
in effect that preference in hiring be given to the contracting union's<br />
members," or otherwise establishes hiring practices that result in<br />
°Local Joint Executive <strong>Board</strong> of Hotel cl Restaurant Employees etc (Crown Cafeteria),<br />
130 NLRB 1551<br />
7 Subordinate Lodge No 169, Boilermakers (A B Anderson Construction Co ), 129<br />
NLRB 1003, Member Fanning dissenting on another point<br />
8 Local 49, Operating Engineers (AGO of Minnesota), 129 NLRB 399 Compare Ford<br />
Motor Co (Sterling Plant), 131 NLRB No 174<br />
2 International Association of Bridge, Structural 4 Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 494<br />
(Spiegelberg Lumber 4 Building Go), 128 NLRB 1379, Members Rodgers and Fanning<br />
dissenting<br />
"See, e g, Union Taxi Corp, 130 NLRB 814, Southeastern Plate Glass Co, 129 NLRB<br />
412, Member TenkIna (lamenting In part, Amerman Ad, enuring Distributors 12e NLRB<br />
1340