TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 119<br />
use the hiring hall 83 In another case, the <strong>Board</strong> found one violation<br />
of section 8(b) (1) (A) where the union attempted to have a<br />
leading organizer for a rival union discharged for distributing literature<br />
and "agitating" for the rival union, and a separate violation<br />
of the same section where a. fight with this employee was deliberately<br />
provoked for the purpose of forcing the employee to violate the employer's<br />
rule and fixed policy that the one who strikes the first blow<br />
is subject to discharge 84<br />
During the past year an employer and a union were held to have<br />
violated section 8(a) (1) and 8(b) (1) (A), respectively, by interrogating<br />
certain workers about their participation in circulating a<br />
petition protesting representation by this union, which had been recognized<br />
by the employer for a group of employees although it did not<br />
then enjoy majority status 85 These employees were summoned to<br />
the plant office and interrogated by a union official in the presence<br />
of other union repiesentatives and employer officials<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> continued to adhere to the view that by the failure of<br />
union officials, present when serious acts of violence occur, to halt or<br />
repudiate the coercive conduct of its union members, the union ratifies<br />
such acts and is liable for their commission 88 In one instance, the<br />
union was held responsible for the conduct of a rank-and-file member<br />
who acted as an agent in securing signed authorization cards for<br />
organizational purposes, whether or not the specific conduct had been<br />
authorized or ratified 87<br />
(2) Illegal Union-Security and Employment Practices<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> has consistently held that the execution, maintenance,<br />
or enforcement of illegal union-security and employment agreements,<br />
which condition employment on union membership, is not only violative<br />
of section 8(b) (2), 88 but is also violative of section 8 (b) (1) (A)<br />
in that such action inevitably restrains and coerces employees in their<br />
section 7 right to acquire and maintain, or refrain from acquiring or<br />
maintaining, union membership 89<br />
= Subordinate Lodge No 169, Boilermakers (A B Anderson Consttuction Co ), 129<br />
NLRB 1003, Member Fanning concurring and dissenting in part<br />
B4 Local 212, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft it Agricultural Implement<br />
Workers (Chrysler Corp ), 128 NLRB 952<br />
Stokley-Bordo, 130 NLRB 869<br />
al Local 6881, UMW (Grundy Mining Cc), 130 NLRB 1181.<br />
ST International Woodworkers of America (Central Venee r), idi NLRB No 20, Member<br />
Fanning dissenting Although the <strong>Board</strong> majority found that an unfair labor practice<br />
had been committed, it held that, under the circumstances, a remedial order was not<br />
warranted<br />
a See beim% , pp 123-127<br />
a, See International Union, UAW, APL—CIO, etc (John I Paulding, Inc ), 130 NLRB<br />
1035, which involved the unlawful application of a lawful maintenance of membership<br />
clause