07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 119<br />

use the hiring hall 83 In another case, the <strong>Board</strong> found one violation<br />

of section 8(b) (1) (A) where the union attempted to have a<br />

leading organizer for a rival union discharged for distributing literature<br />

and "agitating" for the rival union, and a separate violation<br />

of the same section where a. fight with this employee was deliberately<br />

provoked for the purpose of forcing the employee to violate the employer's<br />

rule and fixed policy that the one who strikes the first blow<br />

is subject to discharge 84<br />

During the past year an employer and a union were held to have<br />

violated section 8(a) (1) and 8(b) (1) (A), respectively, by interrogating<br />

certain workers about their participation in circulating a<br />

petition protesting representation by this union, which had been recognized<br />

by the employer for a group of employees although it did not<br />

then enjoy majority status 85 These employees were summoned to<br />

the plant office and interrogated by a union official in the presence<br />

of other union repiesentatives and employer officials<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> continued to adhere to the view that by the failure of<br />

union officials, present when serious acts of violence occur, to halt or<br />

repudiate the coercive conduct of its union members, the union ratifies<br />

such acts and is liable for their commission 88 In one instance, the<br />

union was held responsible for the conduct of a rank-and-file member<br />

who acted as an agent in securing signed authorization cards for<br />

organizational purposes, whether or not the specific conduct had been<br />

authorized or ratified 87<br />

(2) Illegal Union-Security and Employment Practices<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> has consistently held that the execution, maintenance,<br />

or enforcement of illegal union-security and employment agreements,<br />

which condition employment on union membership, is not only violative<br />

of section 8(b) (2), 88 but is also violative of section 8 (b) (1) (A)<br />

in that such action inevitably restrains and coerces employees in their<br />

section 7 right to acquire and maintain, or refrain from acquiring or<br />

maintaining, union membership 89<br />

= Subordinate Lodge No 169, Boilermakers (A B Anderson Consttuction Co ), 129<br />

NLRB 1003, Member Fanning concurring and dissenting in part<br />

B4 Local 212, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft it Agricultural Implement<br />

Workers (Chrysler Corp ), 128 NLRB 952<br />

Stokley-Bordo, 130 NLRB 869<br />

al Local 6881, UMW (Grundy Mining Cc), 130 NLRB 1181.<br />

ST International Woodworkers of America (Central Venee r), idi NLRB No 20, Member<br />

Fanning dissenting Although the <strong>Board</strong> majority found that an unfair labor practice<br />

had been committed, it held that, under the circumstances, a remedial order was not<br />

warranted<br />

a See beim% , pp 123-127<br />

a, See International Union, UAW, APL—CIO, etc (John I Paulding, Inc ), 130 NLRB<br />

1035, which involved the unlawful application of a lawful maintenance of membership<br />

clause

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!