TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
before the filing of the petition °° Where the signing requirement has<br />
been complied with, the conti act will be recognized as a bar even<br />
though it is not embodied in a formal document Thus, an agreement<br />
evidenced by the exchange of a written proposal and a written acceptance,<br />
both signed, may be sufficient However, where not signed by<br />
both parties,° 1 or by persons authorized to sign on their behalf: 12 it<br />
will not be deemed a bar<br />
(1) Date of Execution<br />
Because a contract, to be a bai , must have been executed prior to<br />
the filing of the petition,°3 a question is frequently raised as to the date<br />
a contract is deemed to have been executed 64 The <strong>Board</strong> has held<br />
that a signed agreement, which was not to become binding until countersigned<br />
by a duly authorized officer of the international union, was<br />
executed as of the date it was countersigned, not before 85 It has also<br />
held contracts no bar where executed by an employer a month after a<br />
petition was filed, 6° where made retroactively effective, and a petition<br />
was filed 1 day following the effective date but before the execution<br />
date, 87 and where dated 1 day prior to the filing of a petition but not<br />
executed until 1 week later 68<br />
Parol evidence as to the date of execution cannot vary the express<br />
terms of the conti act 69 But where a contract is made effective as of a<br />
date subsequent to its execution, the effective date rather than the<br />
execution date is controlling for contract=bar purposes 70<br />
b Coverage of Contract<br />
To bar a petitiqin an asserted contract must clearly cover the employees<br />
sought M. the petition 71 and embrace an appropriate unit 72<br />
Thus, a contract between a union and a food store chain covering its<br />
retail establishments was held inapplicable to a food department managed<br />
by the chain -for another company, under an agreement for a percentage<br />
of the gross receipts, and found no bar to a petition for a<br />
00 Appalachsan Shale Products Co. 121 NLRB 1160 (1958) , I Mow Cab, lac, 131 NLRB<br />
No 41<br />
redloto Cab, Inc , above<br />
▪ Wwkly, Inc , 131 NLRB No 65<br />
°See Appalachian Shale Products Co , above<br />
• For the converse question as to the timeliness of a petition, see the discussion, below,<br />
p 50<br />
(15 Charles Leonard, Inc , 131 NLRB No 137<br />
W Horace Williams Co, 130 NLRB 223<br />
ft Nissen Baking Corp , 131 NLRB No 90<br />
08 Printsng Industry of Delaware, 181 NLRB No 135<br />
Lion Brand, Inc , 131 NLRB No 32<br />
7° Buy Low Supermarket, Inc , 131 NLRB No 4<br />
n Yellow Cab, Ino , 131 NLRB No 41, Ben Aerosystems Co , 131 NLRB No 28<br />
7° See Twenty fourth Annual Report (1859), p 21, for discussion of Appalachian Shade<br />
Products Oo ,121 NLRB 1180 (1958)