TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Enforcement Litigation 175<br />
c Strikes and Boycotts Prohibited by Section 8(b)(4)<br />
In one group of cases under section 8(b) (4), the issue was whethet<br />
a union's conduct amounted to an attempt to "induce or encout age"<br />
work stoppages Several cases decided during the yeai presented the<br />
question whether an employer against which a union was directing a<br />
strike or picket line occupied the position of a "neutral" in the underlying<br />
labor dispute so as to be entitled to protection under section<br />
8(b) (4) (A) and (B) of the 1947 act Other cases concerned the<br />
legality of picketing in "common situs" situations And one case<br />
involved an alleged violation of section 8(b) (4) (C)<br />
(1) Inducement or Encouragement of Work Stoppages<br />
Section 8(b) (4), both before and after the 1959 amendments, forbids<br />
unions to "induce or encourage" work stoppages for certain<br />
objects In Korber Hats," the Fourth Circuit agreed with the <strong>Board</strong><br />
that the union engaged in proscribed inducement and encouragement<br />
by picketing in front of the establishment of an eziployer which sold<br />
at wholesale the products of a manufacturer with which the union<br />
had a dispute. Rejecting the union's contention that the picketing<br />
constituted an appeal to the wholesaler's customers not to buy the<br />
products of the struck manufacturer, the court held that a refusal<br />
by deliverymen to handle the wholesaler's goods "would be a natural<br />
and reasonable result of the inducement and encouragement offered,"<br />
and the fact that they did not refuse was not proof of the absence of<br />
the invitation<br />
However, in another case," the District of Columbia Circuit disapproved<br />
the <strong>Board</strong>'s finding that a union "induced" a work stoppage,<br />
within the meaning of section 8(b) (4) , when a foreman, 5° who was<br />
a member of the union, advised other union members on a construction<br />
job that the employees of one of the other contractors on the job<br />
were nonunion While the foreman's conduct may have been a reminder<br />
to the other members of their duty under union rules not to<br />
work with nonunion men, the court stated, it did not show that he<br />
tried to induce a strike in light of the fact that he sought and followed<br />
the advice of the union business agent, who told him to continue work<br />
(2) Secondary Boycotts<br />
(a) What constitutes a "neutral" employer<br />
Section 8(b) (4) (A) of the 1947 act, as section 8 (b) (4) (B) of the<br />
present act, proscribed the inducement of work stoppages only where<br />
48 NLRB v United Hatters, Cap Millinery Workers Union, AFL—CIO, 286 F 2d 950<br />
• United Brotherhood of Carpenter. (6 Joiners of America, AFL—CIO v NLRB (Endicott<br />
Church), 286 F 2d 553<br />
60 Compare with conduct of another foreman in this case discussed above, p 178