07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enforcement Litigation 175<br />

c Strikes and Boycotts Prohibited by Section 8(b)(4)<br />

In one group of cases under section 8(b) (4), the issue was whethet<br />

a union's conduct amounted to an attempt to "induce or encout age"<br />

work stoppages Several cases decided during the yeai presented the<br />

question whether an employer against which a union was directing a<br />

strike or picket line occupied the position of a "neutral" in the underlying<br />

labor dispute so as to be entitled to protection under section<br />

8(b) (4) (A) and (B) of the 1947 act Other cases concerned the<br />

legality of picketing in "common situs" situations And one case<br />

involved an alleged violation of section 8(b) (4) (C)<br />

(1) Inducement or Encouragement of Work Stoppages<br />

Section 8(b) (4), both before and after the 1959 amendments, forbids<br />

unions to "induce or encourage" work stoppages for certain<br />

objects In Korber Hats," the Fourth Circuit agreed with the <strong>Board</strong><br />

that the union engaged in proscribed inducement and encouragement<br />

by picketing in front of the establishment of an eziployer which sold<br />

at wholesale the products of a manufacturer with which the union<br />

had a dispute. Rejecting the union's contention that the picketing<br />

constituted an appeal to the wholesaler's customers not to buy the<br />

products of the struck manufacturer, the court held that a refusal<br />

by deliverymen to handle the wholesaler's goods "would be a natural<br />

and reasonable result of the inducement and encouragement offered,"<br />

and the fact that they did not refuse was not proof of the absence of<br />

the invitation<br />

However, in another case," the District of Columbia Circuit disapproved<br />

the <strong>Board</strong>'s finding that a union "induced" a work stoppage,<br />

within the meaning of section 8(b) (4) , when a foreman, 5° who was<br />

a member of the union, advised other union members on a construction<br />

job that the employees of one of the other contractors on the job<br />

were nonunion While the foreman's conduct may have been a reminder<br />

to the other members of their duty under union rules not to<br />

work with nonunion men, the court stated, it did not show that he<br />

tried to induce a strike in light of the fact that he sought and followed<br />

the advice of the union business agent, who told him to continue work<br />

(2) Secondary Boycotts<br />

(a) What constitutes a "neutral" employer<br />

Section 8(b) (4) (A) of the 1947 act, as section 8 (b) (4) (B) of the<br />

present act, proscribed the inducement of work stoppages only where<br />

48 NLRB v United Hatters, Cap Millinery Workers Union, AFL—CIO, 286 F 2d 950<br />

• United Brotherhood of Carpenter. (6 Joiners of America, AFL—CIO v NLRB (Endicott<br />

Church), 286 F 2d 553<br />

60 Compare with conduct of another foreman in this case discussed above, p 178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!