07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

(3) "Agency Shop"<br />

The question arose dining the past fiscal year whether an employer's<br />

refusal to bargain on a union's "agency shop" proposal—under which<br />

employees would be required to pay to the union the equivalent of<br />

initiation fees and monthly dues regularly required of union members,<br />

as a condition of employment after 30 days following the date of the<br />

agieement or initial employment, whichever was later—for a plant<br />

located in a "right-to-work" State which prohibits at rangements requiring<br />

union membei ship but not such "agency shops," constituted a<br />

refusal to bargain 55 After the close of the fiscal year, a <strong>Board</strong> majority<br />

m the General Motors case 4° vacated an earlier majority decision<br />

in the same case dismissing the complaint," and held this "agency<br />

shop" proposal lawful union security under the act, absent any "suggestion"<br />

that union membership was not available to any nonmembei<br />

employee 'Who wished to join," hence a mandatory baigaining subject<br />

d Violation of Bargaining Duty<br />

An employer violates section 8(a) (5) not only by an outught<br />

refusal to bargain with the majority representative of his employees,"<br />

but also by bat gaining only ostensibly and not with a good-faith intent<br />

to reach agreement," oi by conduct which interferes with the bargaining<br />

process or undeimines the bargaining representative 45 During<br />

fiscal 1961, a number of cases turned on the question whether the<br />

employer unlawfully interfered with the bargaining process by such<br />

conduct as the refusal to fuinish information requested by the bai gaming<br />

representative, the unilateral change in terms of employment, and<br />

other acts inconsistent with the bat gaining requirement<br />

(1) Refusal To Furnish Information<br />

The statutory duty of an employer to bargain in good faith includes<br />

the duty to comply with the bargaining representative's request foi<br />

"wage and other employment information essential to the intelligent<br />

representation of the employees " 48 Moreover, "while an employe'<br />

"General Motors Corp • 130 NLRB 481<br />

" 133 NLRB No 21 (Sept 29, 1961). Chairman McCulloch and Members Rodgers, Fanning,<br />

and Brown, Member Leedom dissenting<br />

41 130 NLRB 481, former Chairman Leedom and Members Jenkins and Kimball—Members<br />

Rodgers and Fanning dissenting<br />

See discussion above, p 102<br />

" See, e g • Benevento Sand d Gravel Co, 131 NLRB No 45 • Rural Electric Co • 130<br />

NLRB 799, P Bennett Mfg Co, 129 NLRB 506<br />

44 See, e g • Borg Warner Controls, 128 NLRB 1035, 1050-1051, Kohler Co , 128 NLRB<br />

1082, 1068 "M" System, Inc , 129 NLRB 527, 547-553 (totality of employees conduct)<br />

California Girl, Inc, 129 NLRB 209, footnote 3 (totality of employer's course of conduct)<br />

a See, e g, Kohler Co, above, pp 1079-1080, Bilton Insulation, Inc • 129 NLRB 1296<br />

a Kohler Co • 128 NLRB 1062, 1073 See also NLRB v Truitt Mfg Co. 351 11 S 149<br />

(1950 , Twenty first Annual Report (1958), p 128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!