TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
112 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
(3) "Agency Shop"<br />
The question arose dining the past fiscal year whether an employer's<br />
refusal to bargain on a union's "agency shop" proposal—under which<br />
employees would be required to pay to the union the equivalent of<br />
initiation fees and monthly dues regularly required of union members,<br />
as a condition of employment after 30 days following the date of the<br />
agieement or initial employment, whichever was later—for a plant<br />
located in a "right-to-work" State which prohibits at rangements requiring<br />
union membei ship but not such "agency shops," constituted a<br />
refusal to bargain 55 After the close of the fiscal year, a <strong>Board</strong> majority<br />
m the General Motors case 4° vacated an earlier majority decision<br />
in the same case dismissing the complaint," and held this "agency<br />
shop" proposal lawful union security under the act, absent any "suggestion"<br />
that union membership was not available to any nonmembei<br />
employee 'Who wished to join," hence a mandatory baigaining subject<br />
d Violation of Bargaining Duty<br />
An employer violates section 8(a) (5) not only by an outught<br />
refusal to bargain with the majority representative of his employees,"<br />
but also by bat gaining only ostensibly and not with a good-faith intent<br />
to reach agreement," oi by conduct which interferes with the bargaining<br />
process or undeimines the bargaining representative 45 During<br />
fiscal 1961, a number of cases turned on the question whether the<br />
employer unlawfully interfered with the bargaining process by such<br />
conduct as the refusal to fuinish information requested by the bai gaming<br />
representative, the unilateral change in terms of employment, and<br />
other acts inconsistent with the bat gaining requirement<br />
(1) Refusal To Furnish Information<br />
The statutory duty of an employer to bargain in good faith includes<br />
the duty to comply with the bargaining representative's request foi<br />
"wage and other employment information essential to the intelligent<br />
representation of the employees " 48 Moreover, "while an employe'<br />
"General Motors Corp • 130 NLRB 481<br />
" 133 NLRB No 21 (Sept 29, 1961). Chairman McCulloch and Members Rodgers, Fanning,<br />
and Brown, Member Leedom dissenting<br />
41 130 NLRB 481, former Chairman Leedom and Members Jenkins and Kimball—Members<br />
Rodgers and Fanning dissenting<br />
See discussion above, p 102<br />
" See, e g • Benevento Sand d Gravel Co, 131 NLRB No 45 • Rural Electric Co • 130<br />
NLRB 799, P Bennett Mfg Co, 129 NLRB 506<br />
44 See, e g • Borg Warner Controls, 128 NLRB 1035, 1050-1051, Kohler Co , 128 NLRB<br />
1082, 1068 "M" System, Inc , 129 NLRB 527, 547-553 (totality of employees conduct)<br />
California Girl, Inc, 129 NLRB 209, footnote 3 (totality of employer's course of conduct)<br />
a See, e g, Kohler Co, above, pp 1079-1080, Bilton Insulation, Inc • 129 NLRB 1296<br />
a Kohler Co • 128 NLRB 1062, 1073 See also NLRB v Truitt Mfg Co. 351 11 S 149<br />
(1950 , Twenty first Annual Report (1958), p 128