TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 151<br />
predecessor's employees, and that the only dispute was over terms<br />
and conditions of their employment In the majority's opinion, this<br />
constituted an aclmasion of the alleged violation since the statute<br />
prohibits picketing to force bargaining as well as recognition In any<br />
event, the majority considered an object of the picketing to be to force<br />
the reinstatement of certain discharged employees and therefore to<br />
secure recognition." The majority rejected its dissenting colleague's<br />
contention that because this conduct might be deemed to violate section<br />
8(b) (4) (D) it could not be an 8(b) (7) (C) violation<br />
In the only 8(b) (7) (A) case to come before the <strong>Board</strong> during the<br />
past year, the <strong>Board</strong> adopted the trial examiner's findings that the<br />
union violated this section by picketing at a time when no question concerning<br />
representation could be raised." In this case, the employer<br />
had a contract with another union covering an entire production and<br />
maintenance unit, which had been iecently renewed during the socalled<br />
Deluxe "insulated peuod " 25 And the picketing union, seeking<br />
only a segment of the unit, picketed after the .contract had been<br />
effectively renewed<br />
On this point, also see Stork Restaurant, cited above<br />
PA<br />
182 Teamsters (Sitrue, Inc), 129 NLRB 1459<br />
23 For a discussion of this "insulated period," see above, pp 50-51
Change language