07.02.2015 Views

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

(1) Craft Status<br />

Craft status and the consequent right to separate representation<br />

was recognized in one case 83 involving both welders and experimental<br />

mechanics who were highly skilled welders, because they were engaged<br />

in the same industry as the welders found to be craftsmen in Hughes<br />

Az2 craft 84 and exercised duties and skills similar to those of the<br />

elders in that case Pointing out that the smaller group of experimental<br />

mechanics, who were employed in a previously unrepresented<br />

department, may not be merged with the larger unit of welders, who<br />

were previously represented in the existing production and maintenance<br />

unit, without a self-determination election, a <strong>Board</strong> majority<br />

dismissed the petition, since a unit of welders excluding the experimental<br />

mechanics would include only a segment of the employer's<br />

welders, and the petitioner's showing of interest did not cover experimental<br />

mechanics 85<br />

In another case, cabinetmakers at a department store were held by<br />

a majority of the <strong>Board</strong> to constitute a craft group appropriate for<br />

separate representation because they exercised the skills generally<br />

attributed to cabinetmakers—an occupation broadly recognized in<br />

industry as entailing a high form of skill—and they utilized in their<br />

work the traditional tools of the carpentry craft 85 However, finishers,<br />

furniture road servicemen, and benchmen were held in the same<br />

case to have no craft status In none of the latter classifications<br />

were the employees required to serve any apprenticeship or formal<br />

training Although they had long employment in their jobs, the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> majority was not convinced that upon attainment of job proficiency<br />

they pgssessed and exercised the high degree of manual<br />

dexterity and judgment necessary to qualify as true craftsmen Nor<br />

were they held to be a functionally distinct department severable<br />

within the narrowly confined criteria of American Potash,<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> dismissed a petition for severance of papercutters in a<br />

setup paper box department because the papercutters were held to<br />

have no craft status 87 They did not exhibit the range of skills, the<br />

long period of training, or the high degree of judgment and manual<br />

dexterity required for severance on a craft basis<br />

(2) Craft and Departmental Severance<br />

As heretofore, severance of true craft groups, or functionally<br />

distinct and homogeneous traditional departmental groups, from<br />

Aerofet General Corp, 129 NLRB 1492, Members Panning and Kimball dissenting<br />

" Hughea Aircraft Co, 117 NLRB 98 (1957)<br />

For discussion of showing of interest aspect, see above. P 33<br />

I" May Department Stoics Co • 129 NLRB 21, Member Rodgers dissenting<br />

87 II Burt Co • 130 NLRB 1115, Members Fanning and Kimball dissenting in other<br />

respects

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!