TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VI<br />
Enforcement Litigation<br />
<strong>Board</strong> orders in unfair labor practice proceedings were reviewed<br />
by the courts of appeals in 148 enforcement cases during fiscal 1961 1<br />
Some of the more important issues decided by the respective courts<br />
are discussed in this chapter<br />
1. Employees Protected by the Act—The Agricultural Exclusion<br />
The definition of "employee" in section 5(3) expressly excludes,<br />
among others, "any individual employed as an akricultural laborer"<br />
And a longstanding rider to the <strong>Board</strong>'s annual appropriations act<br />
has the effect of writing into this provision the definition of "agriculture"<br />
set forth in section 3(f) of the Fair <strong>Labor</strong> Standards Act<br />
As there defined, "agriculture" consists of "farming in all its<br />
branches and any practices performed by a farmer or on a farm<br />
as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations,<br />
including preparation for market, delivery to storage or to market<br />
25<br />
In enforcing the <strong>Board</strong>'s order in one case,' the Tenth Circuit<br />
held that these provisions did not exclude from the statutory term<br />
"employee," truckdrivers working for a cooperative milk marketing<br />
association, even though the membership of the cooperative<br />
was limited to farmers Citing a 1949 Supreme Court decision,' the<br />
court pointed out that the employer "entity" here was the cooperative,<br />
not its individual members, and, as it was not itself engaged in<br />
farming, its delivery drivers were not engaged in "practices performed<br />
by a farmer" In another case involving similar facts,' the<br />
Sixth Circuit likewise rejected a claim that the employees of a<br />
farmers' cooperative association were "agricultural laborers" outside<br />
the protection of the act In addition, the court noted that such cooperatives<br />
are not entitled to exemption on the ground that they<br />
are nonprofit organizations<br />
1 Results of enforcement litigation are summarized in table 19 of Appendix A<br />
2 NLRB v Central Oklahoma Milk Producers dean, 285 le 2d 495<br />
8 Farmets Reaervo gr d Irrigation Co McComb, 337 US 755 (1949)<br />
Lucas County Farm Bureau Cooperative Assll N NLRB, 289 F 2d 844<br />
161